From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751845AbaKDD6S (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Nov 2014 22:58:18 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:37120 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751376AbaKDD6R (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Nov 2014 22:58:17 -0500 Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 19:57:07 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Wolfram Sang Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PULL REQUEST] remove .owner for most platform_drivers Message-ID: <20141104035707.GA8718@kroah.com> References: <20141021165441.GA1619@katana> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141021165441.GA1619@katana> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 06:54:41PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Hi Greg, > > as discussed at ELCE, here is my pull request for cleaning up all unneeded > assignment of .owner for platform drivers. I used the following semantic patch > to check that it only removes it when .owner gets initialized by the call to > register the driver: I've pulled this, and pushed it out in my driver-core-testing branch to make sure nothing breaks. Just to be sure, the 4 other patches you sent also need to go in here for 3.19, right? They were not included in this pull request? thanks, greg k-h