From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751986AbaKESpn (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Nov 2014 13:45:43 -0500 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:42290 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750959AbaKESp2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Nov 2014 13:45:28 -0500 Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 18:44:38 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?F=E4rber?= Cc: Sangbeom Kim , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Liam Girdwood , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Ben Dooks , Kukjin Kim , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , LKML Message-ID: <20141105184438.GI8509@sirena.org.uk> References: <1415205892-5553-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> <20141105170957.GE8509@sirena.org.uk> <545A683A.9010301@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="a7XSrSxqzVsaECgU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <545A683A.9010301@suse.de> X-Cookie: Many pages make a thick book. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 85.210.170.115 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: samsung: Add MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE for Snow X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --a7XSrSxqzVsaECgU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 07:11:06PM +0100, Andreas F=E4rber wrote: > Am 05.11.2014 um 18:09 schrieb Mark Brown: > > On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 05:44:52PM +0100, Andreas F=E4rber wrote: > >> This enables the snd_soc_snow module to be auto-loaded. > > Applied, thanks. > Thanks. I notice you dropped my Fixes: line that SubmittingPatches asks > for. When do I need it and when should I leave it out? I thought it > tells GregKH more precisely which stable branches are affected for > backports than just a CC. It's not really adding anything if it's just identifying the patch that created the file in the first place and what actually happened here is that I applied it without the tag then later went back and decided to add a stable Cc since it was probably worth that. --a7XSrSxqzVsaECgU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUWnAVAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQzDcH/iyWEAs3xvkRXU8qDtNuEgPr kay9p+HJ/dRc20hw7bqjxnjCzEefu0kgLMjzSwqIX7QcUiTn9XmqoNfkEEz+DvLO lGgpPai53oHZPSjSwC0AQmYeTnZzDw8xJJW64K4CbKj+8pTSK3rUyToCyGh962C+ kJE5iRqIUaiVmzutEw5oIcQYNbXOQ6rKltb8VDK1SF/YKfum7wPkBmmktB7SkfPZ 3qaFq0PEsn2SbzYFqaJU7r4HhPp8WsO+l91PWnole2Gc6t40t1vgEHQikip6T8RW TGr5JsCXcRgKMRbv+UXvAU67BKQ/dDSX4kHFybzEy2XwYf9L3iJHDz0vOwPJRhY= =xYy6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --a7XSrSxqzVsaECgU--