From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751510AbaKJSY0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Nov 2014 13:24:26 -0500 Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:57579 "EHLO mail-wg0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751392AbaKJSYX (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Nov 2014 13:24:23 -0500 Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 19:17:04 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Anvin , Jan Beulich , tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tony Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] x86: also CFI-annotate certain inline asm()s Message-ID: <20141110181704.GA25757@gmail.com> References: <5458A9600200007800044AE5@mail.emea.novell.com> <20141110100117.GA15841@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Nov 10, 2014 2:01 AM, "Ingo Molnar" wrote: > > > > (Assuming nobody objects strongly.) > > I object strongly to anything this disgustingly ugly, > especially since it doesn't even have a strong stated reason. Fair enough! Thanks, Ingo