From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
To: Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>
Cc: agross@codeaurora.org, galak@codeaurora.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dmaengine: qcom_bam_dma: Generalize BAM register offset calculations
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 16:10:33 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141112104033.GF24582@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1411965189-24499-1-git-send-email-architt@codeaurora.org>
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:03:07AM +0530, Archit Taneja wrote:
> The BAM DMA IP comes in different versions. The register offset layout varies
> among these versions. The layouts depend on which generation/family of SoCs they
> belong to.
>
> The current SoCs(like 8084, 8074) have a layout where the Top level registers
> come in the beginning of the address range, followed by pipe and event
> registers. The BAM revision numbers fall above 1.4.0.
>
> The older SoCs (like 8064, 8960) have a layout where the pipe registers come
> first, and the top level come later. These have BAM revision numbers lesser than
> 1.4.0.
>
> It isn't suitable to have macros provide the register offsets with the layouts
> changed. Future BAM revisions may have different register layouts too. The
> register addresses are now calculated by referring a table which contains a base
> offset and multipliers for pipe/evnt/ee registers.
>
> We have a common function bam_addr() which computes addresses for all the
> registers. When computing address of top level/ee registers, we pass 0 to the
> pipe argument in addr() since they don't have any multiple instances.
>
> Some of the unused register definitions are removed. We can add new registers as
> we need them.
Applied alll three, thanks
--
~Vinod
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-12 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1411037575-13153-1-git-send-email-architt@codeaurora.org>
2014-09-29 4:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] dmaengine: qcom_bam_dma: Generalize BAM register offset calculations Archit Taneja
2014-09-29 4:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] dmaengine: qcom_bam_dma: Add BAM v1.3.0 support Archit Taneja
2014-09-29 4:33 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] dt/bindings: dmaengine: qcom_bam_dma: Add compatible string for BAM v1.3.0 Archit Taneja
2014-09-29 22:14 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] dmaengine: qcom_bam_dma: Generalize BAM register offset calculations Andy Gross
2014-10-01 8:22 ` Pramod Gurav
2014-10-02 5:24 ` Andy Gross
2014-11-12 10:40 ` Vinod Koul [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141112104033.GF24582@intel.com \
--to=vinod.koul@intel.com \
--cc=agross@codeaurora.org \
--cc=architt@codeaurora.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox