From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/cputime: fix clock_nanosleep/clock_gettime inconsistency
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 12:37:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141112113737.GI10476@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141112111553.GA21343@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 12:15:53PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:29:28AM +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> > Issue happens because on start in thread_group_cputimer() we initialize
> > sum_exec_runtime of cputimer with threads runtime not yet accounted and
> > then add the threads runtime again on scheduler tick. When cputimer
> > finish, it's sum_exec_runtime value is bigger than current sum counted
> > by iterating over the threads in thread_group_cputime().
I'm not seeing how that can happen. We iterate each task once, for each
task we grab sum_exec_runtime + whatever delta.
It doesnt matter if a later interrupt or whatever folds the delta into
sum_exec_runtime, we never look at it again.
What I did found is that we appear to add the delta for the calling task
twice, through:
cpu_timer_sample_group()
thread_group_cputimer()
thread_group_cputime()
times->sum_exec_runtime += task_sched_runtime();
*sample = cputime.sum_exec_runtime + task_delta_exec();
Which would make the sample run ahead, making the sleep short. So would
something like the below not cure things?
---
include/linux/kernel_stat.h | 5 -----
kernel/sched/core.c | 13 -------------
kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/kernel_stat.h b/include/linux/kernel_stat.h
index 8422b4ed6882..b9376cd5a187 100644
--- a/include/linux/kernel_stat.h
+++ b/include/linux/kernel_stat.h
@@ -77,11 +77,6 @@ static inline unsigned int kstat_cpu_irqs_sum(unsigned int cpu)
return kstat_cpu(cpu).irqs_sum;
}
-/*
- * Lock/unlock the current runqueue - to extract task statistics:
- */
-extern unsigned long long task_delta_exec(struct task_struct *);
-
extern void account_user_time(struct task_struct *, cputime_t, cputime_t);
extern void account_system_time(struct task_struct *, int, cputime_t, cputime_t);
extern void account_steal_time(cputime_t);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 5df22f1da07d..85ff99db2591 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2481,19 +2481,6 @@ static u64 do_task_delta_exec(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq)
return ns;
}
-unsigned long long task_delta_exec(struct task_struct *p)
-{
- unsigned long flags;
- struct rq *rq;
- u64 ns = 0;
-
- rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags);
- ns = do_task_delta_exec(p, rq);
- task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &flags);
-
- return ns;
-}
-
/*
* Return accounted runtime for the task.
* In case the task is currently running, return the runtime plus current's
diff --git a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
index 492b986195d5..a16b67859e2a 100644
--- a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
@@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ static int cpu_timer_sample_group(const clockid_t which_clock,
*sample = cputime_to_expires(cputime.utime);
break;
case CPUCLOCK_SCHED:
- *sample = cputime.sum_exec_runtime + task_delta_exec(p);
+ *sample = cputime.sum_exec_runtime;
break;
}
return 0;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-12 11:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-12 10:29 [PATCH] sched/cputime: fix clock_nanosleep/clock_gettime inconsistency Stanislaw Gruszka
2014-11-12 11:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-11-12 11:37 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-11-12 11:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-11-12 12:27 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2014-11-12 12:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-11-16 9:50 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched/cputime: Fix cpu_timer_sample_group() double accounting tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2014-11-12 12:21 ` [PATCH] sched/cputime: fix clock_nanosleep/clock_gettime inconsistency Stanislaw Gruszka
2014-11-12 12:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-11-12 15:58 ` [PATCH v2] " Stanislaw Gruszka
2014-11-12 16:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-11-12 16:17 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2014-11-12 17:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-11-12 16:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-11-12 16:53 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2014-11-12 16:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-11-16 9:50 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched/cputime: Fix clock_nanosleep()/ clock_gettime() inconsistency tip-bot for Stanislaw Gruszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141112113737.GI10476@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox