From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
Hakan Akkan <hakanakkan@gmail.com>,
Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qti.qualcomm.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: Future of NOHZ full/isolation development (was Re: [NOHZ] Remove scheduler_tick_max_deferment)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 14:54:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141112135455.GA6895@lerouge> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohpok3U_8zQurs219fOmwERFrnZ0sOE-YUc7B+fKYfFLmEpg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:41:09AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 11 November 2014 22:45, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Here is a summarized list:
> >
> > * Unbound workqueues affinity (to housekeeper)
> > * Unbound timers affinity (to housekeeper)
> > * 1 Hz residual scheduler tick offlining to housekeeper
> > * Fix some scheduler accounting that don't even work with 1 Hz: cpu load
> > accounting, rt_scale, load balancing, etc...
> > * Lighten the syscall path and get rid of cputime accounting + RCU hooks
> > for people who want isolation + fast syscalls and faults.
> > * Work on non-affinable workqueues
> > * Work on non-affinable timers
> > * ...
>
> + spurious interrupts with NOHZ_FULL on all architectures which break isolation
> but doesn't get caught with traces. Can be observed with this:
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
> index 481fa54..91d490d 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
> @@ -1244,7 +1244,8 @@ void hrtimer_interrupt(struct clock_event_device *dev)
> {
> struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base = this_cpu_ptr(&hrtimer_bases);
> ktime_t expires_next, now, entry_time, delta;
> - int i, retries = 0;
> + int i, retries = 0, count = 0;
> + static int total_spurious;
>
> BUG_ON(!cpu_base->hres_active);
> cpu_base->nr_events++;
> @@ -1304,10 +1305,14 @@ void hrtimer_interrupt(struct clock_event_device *dev)
> break;
> }
>
> + count++;
> __run_hrtimer(timer, &basenow);
> }
> }
>
> + if (!count)
> + pr_err("____%s: Totalspurious: %d\n", __func__,
> ++total_spurious);
> +
I'd rather leave that to tracepoints. Like trace_hrtimer_spurious().
Or better yet: have trace_hrtimer_interrupt() which we can compare against
trace_hrtimer_expire_entry/exit() to check if any hrtimer callback have run
in the interrupt. This way we avoid workarounds like the above count.
> /*
> * Store the new expiry value so the migration code can verify
> * against it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-12 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-31 16:01 [NOHZ] Remove scheduler_tick_max_deferment Christoph Lameter
2014-11-01 19:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-11-01 21:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-11-01 22:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-11-06 17:24 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-11-10 7:11 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-11-10 15:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-11-10 16:21 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-11-10 18:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-11-11 17:15 ` Future of NOHZ full/isolation development (was Re: [NOHZ] Remove scheduler_tick_max_deferment) Frederic Weisbecker
2014-11-11 17:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-11-11 18:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-11-12 6:11 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-11-12 13:54 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2014-11-12 14:56 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-11-12 15:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-11-12 15:16 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-11-13 7:22 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-11-10 16:19 ` [NOHZ] Remove scheduler_tick_max_deferment Christoph Lameter
2014-11-10 22:43 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-11-11 14:58 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-11-11 15:36 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-11-11 17:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-11-10 20:26 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141112135455.GA6895@lerouge \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=gilad@benyossef.com \
--cc=hakanakkan@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxk@qti.qualcomm.com \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox