From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@amd.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/amd: fix accounting of device_state
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:02:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141112140247.GU10744@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1415614899-12602-1-git-send-email-oded.gabbay@amd.com>
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 12:21:39PM +0200, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> This patch fixes a bug in the accounting of the device_state.
> In the current code, the device_state was put (decremented) too many times,
> which sometimes lead to the driver getting stuck permanently in
> put_device_state_wait(). That happen because the device_state->count would go
> below zero, which is never supposed to happen.
>
> The root cause is that the device_state was decremented in put_pasid_state()
> and put_pasid_state_wait() but also in all the functions that call those
> functions. Therefore, the device_state was decremented twice in each of these
> code paths.
>
> The fix is to decouple the device_state accounting from the pasid_state
> accounting - remove the call to put_device_state() from the
> put_pasid_state() and the put_pasid_state_wait())
Right, there was a double drop of the reference to device state. An
alternative would have been to remove the put_device_state call at the
end of the amd_iommu_unbind_pasid() function. But this patch works as
well and is slightly better, so: Applied, thanks.
Joerg
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-12 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-10 10:21 [PATCH] iommu/amd: fix accounting of device_state Oded Gabbay
2014-11-12 14:02 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141112140247.GU10744@8bytes.org \
--to=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oded.gabbay@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox