From: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>
To: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
Cc: cmetcalf@tilera.com,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch: tile: kernel: kgdb.c: Use memcpy() instead of pointer copy one by one
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 13:29:29 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141112192929.GC53560@unpythonic.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5463800C.8050404@gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:43:08PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
> > (I assume the
> > compiler could do things like replace an intended load from memory with
> > a constant load or even no load at all)
> >
>
> Excuse me, my English is not quite well, I can not understand what you
> said above. (If necessary, please help provide more details for it).
I am concerned that writing regs[TREG_TP] is "undefined behavior"
according to the C standard.
This expression is equivalent to *(regs + TREG_TP). The expression
(regs + TREG_TP) does not result in a pointer to any element of regs[],
so dereferencing it is undefined behavior. (Source: C99 draft standard
WG14/N1256, annex J.2, "[The behavior is undefined if t]he operand of
the unary * operator has an invalid value")
That is why the compiler showed the original diagnostic, but the same
logic that made the loop's behavior undefined also makes the expression
regs[TREG_TP] undefined whereever it appears.
None of this is a specific problem with your proposed patch. Rather, it
is a suggestion that the whole structure's design needs to be revisited
in light of compilers beginning to notice that regs[TREG_TP] is
undefined behavior and change their generated code as a result.
Unfortunately it looks like this header is also a part of the userspace
API, so it can't simply be changed just in case all in-kernel uses are
changed.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-12 19:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-01 13:17 [PATCH] arch: tile: kernel: kgdb.c: Use memcpy() instead of pointer copy one by one Chen Gang
2014-11-12 2:11 ` Chen Gang
2014-11-12 13:27 ` Jeff Epler
2014-11-12 15:43 ` Chen Gang
2014-11-12 19:29 ` Jeff Epler [this message]
2014-11-12 20:15 ` Chris Metcalf
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-11-13 0:08 Chen Gang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141112192929.GC53560@unpythonic.net \
--to=jepler@unpythonic.net \
--cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
--cc=gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).