From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] arm: perf: parse cpu affinity from dt
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:08:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141117150804.GC25416@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141117112033.GF18061@arm.com>
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:20:35AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 04:25:34PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > The current way we read interrupts form devicetree assumes that
> > interrupts are in increasing order of logical cpu id (MPIDR.Aff{2,1,0}),
> > and that these logical ids are in a contiguous block. This may not be
> > the case in general - after a kexec cpu ids may be arbitrarily assigned,
> > and multi-cluster systems do not have a contiguous range of cpu ids.
> >
> > This patch parses cpu affinity information for interrupts from an
> > optional "interrupts-affinity" devicetree property described in the
> > devicetree binding document. Support for existing dts and board files
> > remains.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h | 12 +++
> > arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c | 196 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> > 2 files changed, 161 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h
> > index b630a44..92fc1da 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h
> > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> > #ifndef __ARM_PMU_H__
> > #define __ARM_PMU_H__
> >
> > +#include <linux/cpumask.h>
> > #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > #include <linux/perf_event.h>
> >
> > @@ -89,6 +90,15 @@ struct pmu_hw_events {
> > struct arm_pmu *percpu_pmu;
> > };
> >
> > +/*
> > + * For systems with heterogeneous PMUs, we need to know which CPUs each
> > + * (possibly percpu) IRQ targets. Map between them with an array of these.
> > + */
> > +struct cpu_irq {
> > + cpumask_t cpus;
> > + int irq;
> > +};
> > +
> > struct arm_pmu {
> > struct pmu pmu;
> > cpumask_t active_irqs;
> > @@ -118,6 +128,8 @@ struct arm_pmu {
> > struct platform_device *plat_device;
> > struct pmu_hw_events __percpu *hw_events;
> > struct notifier_block hotplug_nb;
> > + int nr_irqs;
> > + struct cpu_irq *irq_map;
> > };
> >
> > #define to_arm_pmu(p) (container_of(p, struct arm_pmu, pmu))
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c
> > index dfcaba5..f09c8a0 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c
> > @@ -85,20 +85,27 @@ static void cpu_pmu_free_irq(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
> > struct platform_device *pmu_device = cpu_pmu->plat_device;
> > struct pmu_hw_events __percpu *hw_events = cpu_pmu->hw_events;
> >
> > - irqs = min(pmu_device->num_resources, num_possible_cpus());
> > + irqs = cpu_pmu->nr_irqs;
> >
> > - irq = platform_get_irq(pmu_device, 0);
> > - if (irq >= 0 && irq_is_percpu(irq)) {
> > - on_each_cpu(cpu_pmu_disable_percpu_irq, &irq, 1);
> > - free_percpu_irq(irq, &hw_events->percpu_pmu);
> > - } else {
> > - for (i = 0; i < irqs; ++i) {
> > - if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(i, &cpu_pmu->active_irqs))
> > - continue;
> > - irq = platform_get_irq(pmu_device, i);
> > - if (irq >= 0)
> > - free_irq(irq, per_cpu_ptr(&hw_events->percpu_pmu, i));
> > + for (i = 0; i < irqs; i++) {
> > + struct cpu_irq *map = &cpu_pmu->irq_map[i];
> > + irq = map->irq;
> > +
> > + if (irq <= 0)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + if (irq_is_percpu(irq)) {
> > + on_each_cpu(cpu_pmu_disable_percpu_irq, &irq, 1);
>
> Hmm, ok, so we're assuming that all the PMUs will be wired with PPIs in this
> case. I have a patch allowing per-cpu interrupts to be requested for a
> cpumask, but I suppose that can wait until it's actually needed.
I wasn't too keen on assuming all CPUs, but I didn't have the facility
to request a PPI on a subset of CPUs. If you can point me at your patch,
I'd be happy to take a look.
I should have the target CPU mask decoded from whatever the binding
settles on, so at this point it's just plumbing.
Thanks,
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-17 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-07 16:25 [PATCH 00/11] arm: perf: add support for heterogeneous PMUs Mark Rutland
2014-11-07 16:25 ` [PATCH 01/11] of: Add empty of_get_next_parent stub Mark Rutland
2014-11-07 16:25 ` [PATCH 02/11] perf: allow for PMU-specific event filtering Mark Rutland
2014-11-07 16:25 ` [PATCH 03/11] arm: perf: treat PMUs as CPU affine Mark Rutland
2014-11-07 16:25 ` [PATCH 04/11] arm: perf: filter unschedulable events Mark Rutland
2014-11-07 16:25 ` [PATCH 05/11] arm: perf: reject multi-pmu groups Mark Rutland
2014-11-07 16:25 ` [PATCH 06/11] arm: perf: probe number of counters on affine CPUs Mark Rutland
2014-11-07 16:25 ` [PATCH 07/11] arm: perf: document PMU affinity binding Mark Rutland
2014-11-17 11:14 ` Will Deacon
2014-11-17 14:32 ` Rob Herring
2014-11-17 15:01 ` Mark Rutland
2014-11-07 16:25 ` [PATCH 08/11] arm: perf: add functions to parse affinity from dt Mark Rutland
2014-11-17 11:16 ` Will Deacon
2014-11-17 15:02 ` Mark Rutland
2014-11-07 16:25 ` [PATCH 09/11] arm: perf: parse cpu " Mark Rutland
2014-11-17 11:20 ` Will Deacon
2014-11-17 15:08 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2014-11-18 10:40 ` Will Deacon
2014-11-07 16:25 ` [PATCH 10/11] arm: perf: remove singleton PMU restriction Mark Rutland
2014-11-07 16:25 ` [PATCH 11/11] arm: dts: vexpress: describe all PMUs in TC2 dts Mark Rutland
2014-11-17 11:24 ` [PATCH 00/11] arm: perf: add support for heterogeneous PMUs Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141117150804.GC25416@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox