From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1756742AbaKSQFK (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 19 Nov 2014 11:05:10 -0500
Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.19.201]:51762 "EHLO mail.kernel.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S932264AbaKSQFG (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 19 Nov 2014 11:05:06 -0500
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 13:04:58 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Implement lbr-as-callgraph v10
Message-ID: <20141119160458.GG3790@kernel.org>
References: <1415844328-4884-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org>
 <20141117213457.GE4163@kernel.org>
 <20141118104416.GE27645@krava.brq.redhat.com>
 <20141118110007.GF27645@krava.brq.redhat.com>
 <87zjbnpv64.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
 <20141119092323.GC2592@krava.brq.redhat.com>
 <20141119105450.GA22132@krava.brq.redhat.com>
 <20141119141027.GF3790@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20141119141027.GF3790@kernel.org>
X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Em Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:10:27AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:54:50AM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > > BUILD_BUG_ON then?
> > > 
> > > sounds gut
> > 
> > hum, acme/perf/core changed and so has the compile error ;-)
> > we dont overload the <linux/bug.h>, so the kernel one got
> > included, which is wrong.. attached patch fixes that
> 
> I had fixed this but not force pushed out, sorry.
> 
> Now I mistakenly tried running:
> 
> perf report --stdio --no-children --branch-history
> 
> on a file that has no BRANCH_STACK, i.e. a perf.data file on a wrong
> directory since I'm comparing the output of --stdio, --tui and --gtk,
> since it looks --gtk is wrong, still unsure about what the problem is in
> that case, but stumbled on:
> 

I need to investigate this further, so I created a perf/branch-history
branch that has the patches I need to test more rebased on top of my
perf/core branch I just pushed out to Ingo.

- Arnaldo