From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752679AbaKWSjw (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Nov 2014 13:39:52 -0500 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:34523 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752211AbaKWShf (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Nov 2014 13:37:35 -0500 Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 13:37:29 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <20141123.133729.642772258617830867.davem@davemloft.net> To: elfring@users.sourceforge.net Cc: haiyangz@microsoft.com, kys@microsoft.com, devel@linuxdriverproject.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, julia.lawall@lip6.fr Subject: Re: net: Hyper-V: Deletion of an unnecessary check before the function call "vfree" From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <54718A47.20301@users.sourceforge.net> References: <54712F8C.10206@users.sourceforge.net> <20141122.233654.279540319568229037.davem@davemloft.net> <54718A47.20301@users.sourceforge.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.6 on Emacs 24.3 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.7 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Sun, 23 Nov 2014 10:37:34 -0800 (PST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: SF Markus Elfring Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 08:18:31 +0100 >> Whereas if you learn how to base your changes cleanly on the correct >> base now, all of your future submissions will go quickly and smoothly >> into my tree. > > My reluctance to work with more Linux repositories will evolve > over time. The faster affected software versions can be rebuilt > the more it will become interesting to try even more source > code improvements out, won't it? > > I find it nice that you could accept update suggestions for > a few other Linux components already. You are seriously starting to waste our time. Either resubmit your changes against a clean base, or more on. Seriously, all I am purely interested in is seeing properly submitted patches, reviewing them, and then integrating them. Anything else is pure noise to me. Thanks.