From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751954AbaKWRqK (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Nov 2014 12:46:10 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:47803 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751504AbaKWRqI (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Nov 2014 12:46:08 -0500 Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 18:46:04 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: lkml , Rik van Riel , Peter Zijlstra , Steven Rostedt , x86-ml Subject: Re: task_stat splat Message-ID: <20141123174604.GA4054@pd.tnic> References: <20141123111220.GA6436@pd.tnic> <20141123172256.GA9625@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141123172256.GA9625@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 06:22:56PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > Could you identify somehow the line which matches > task_sched_runtime+0x99 ? Probably do_task_delta_exec()... See http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=141675498417759&w=2 Chris triggers the same splat and reverting 6e998916dfe3 ("sched/cputime: Fix clock_nanosleep()/clock_gettime() inconsistency") fixes the issue for him. I'm testing that same thing reverted too, first resume cycle looks good. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. --