public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mips <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>,
	linux-x86_64@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 7/7] kernel: Force ACCESS_ONCE to work only on scalar types
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 12:46:14 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141124204614.GU5050@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFwJEqMv00zkwHmp_LOg74RU3e30-oo6RaYb=yGjgGr2cg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:19:11PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Paul E. McKenney
> <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > OK, how about the following?
> 
> Ugh. Disgusting.
> 
> Why the heck isn't it just "sizeof(*__vp) <= sizeof(long)"?
> 
> If the architecture has a 3-byte scalar type, then it probably has a
> 3-byte load.

Because I was allowing for the possibility of a 3-byte struct, which
as you point out below...

> > It complains if the variable is too large, for example, long long on
> > 32-bit systems or large structures.  It is OK loading from and storing
> > to small structures as well, which I am having a hard time thinking of
> > as a disadvantage.
> 
> .. but that's *exactly* the gcc bug in question. It's a word-sized
> struct that gcc loads twice.

...was a stupid thought anyway.

OK, how about the attempt below?  The initialization of __p complains
for structures and unions, but gets optimized out.

							Thanx, Paul

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

#define get_scalar_volatile_pointer(x) ({ \
	typeof(x) __maybe_unused __p = 0; \
	volatile typeof(x) *__vp = &(x); \
	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*__vp) > sizeof(long)); \
	__vp; })
#define ACCESS_ONCE(x) (*get_scalar_volatile_pointer(x))


  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-24 20:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-24 13:03 [PATCH/RFC 0/7] ACCESS_ONCE and non-scalar accesses Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-24 13:03 ` [PATCH 1/7] KVM: s390: Fix ipte locking Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-24 13:03 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/7] mm: replace page table access via ACCESS_ONCE with barriers Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-24 13:03 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/7] x86: Rework ACCESS_ONCE for spinlock code Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-24 13:03 ` [PATCH/RFC 4/7] x86: Replace ACCESS_ONCE in gup with a barrier Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-24 13:03 ` [PATCH/RFC 5/7] mips: " Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-24 13:03 ` [PATCH/RFC 6/7] arm64: Replace ACCESS_ONCE for spinlock code with barriers Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-24 18:50   ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-24 13:03 ` [PATCH/RFC 7/7] kernel: Force ACCESS_ONCE to work only on scalar types Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-24 13:30   ` David Howells
2014-11-24 17:30     ` Linus Torvalds
2014-11-24 18:02     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2014-11-24 18:35       ` Linus Torvalds
2014-11-24 19:07         ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-24 19:14           ` Linus Torvalds
2014-11-24 19:42             ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-11-24 20:19               ` Linus Torvalds
2014-11-24 20:46                 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2014-11-24 20:28               ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-24 20:04           ` David Howells
2014-11-24 20:34             ` Linus Torvalds
2014-11-24 20:53               ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-24 21:02                 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-11-24 21:16                   ` Christian Borntraeger
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-11-24 20:29 Alexei Starovoitov
2014-11-24 20:45 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-24 20:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-11-24 22:58 Alexei Starovoitov
2014-11-25  0:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-11-25  2:28 Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141124204614.GU5050@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-x86_64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox