linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: "Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>, "X86 ML" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Oleg Nesterov" <oleg@redhat.com>,
	"Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"Andi Kleen" <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	"Josh Triplett" <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	"Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] x86, traps: Track entry into and exit from IST context
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 15:31:02 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141124233101.GA2819@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141124225754.GY5050@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 02:57:54PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 02:36:18PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Paul E. McKenney
> > <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 01:35:01PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> 
> [ . . . ]
> 
> > > And the following Promela model claims that your approach works.
> > > Should I trust it?  ;-)
> > >
> > 
> > I think so.
> > 
> > Want to write a patch?  If so, whose tree should it go in?  I can add
> > it to my IST series, but that seems a bit odd.
> 
> Working on it.  ;-)

And here is a sneak preview of the patch.  Thoughts?

							Thanx, Paul

------------------------------------------------------------------------

rcu: Make rcu_nmi_enter() handle nesting

Andy Lutomirski is introducing ISTs into x86, which from RCU's
viewpoint are NMIs.  Because ISTs and NMIs can nest, rcu_nmi_enter() and
rcu_nmi_exit() must now correctly handle nesting.  This commit therefore
introduces nesting, using a clever NMI-coordination algorithm suggested
by Andy.  The trick is to atomically increment ->dynticks (if needed)
before manipulating ->dynticks_nmi_nesting on entry (and, accordingly,
after on exit).  In addition, ->dynticks_nmi_nesting is incremented by
one if ->dynticks was incremented and by two otherwise.  This means that
when rcu_nmi_exit() sees ->dynticks_nmi_nesting equal to one, it knows
that ->dynticks must be atomically incremented.

This NMI-coordination algorithms has been validated by the following
Promela model, for whatever that might be worth:

/*
 * Promela model for Andy Lutomirski's suggested change to rcu_nmi_enter()
 * that allows nesting.
 *
 * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
 * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
 * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
 * (at your option) any later version.
 *
 * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
 * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
 * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
 * GNU General Public License for more details.
 *
 * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
 * along with this program; if not, you can access it online at
 * http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html.
 *
 * Copyright IBM Corporation, 2014
 *
 * Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 */

byte dynticks_nesting = 0;
byte dynticks_nmi_nesting = 0;
byte dynticks = 0;

/*
 * Promela verision of rcu_nmi_enter().
 */
inline rcu_nmi_enter()
{
	byte incby;

	incby = 2;
	assert(dynticks_nmi_nesting >= 0);
	if
	:: (dynticks & 1) == 0 ->
		atomic {
			dynticks = dynticks + 1;
		}
		assert((dynticks & 1) == 1);
		incby = 1;
	:: else ->
		skip;
	fi;
	dynticks_nmi_nesting = dynticks_nmi_nesting + incby;
	assert(dynticks_nmi_nesting >= 1);
}

/*
 * Promela verision of rcu_nmi_exit().
 */
inline rcu_nmi_exit()
{
	assert(dynticks_nmi_nesting > 0);
	assert((dynticks & 1) != 0);
	if
	:: dynticks_nmi_nesting != 1 ->
		dynticks_nmi_nesting = dynticks_nmi_nesting - 2;
	:: else ->
		dynticks_nmi_nesting = 0;
		atomic {
			dynticks = dynticks + 1;
		}
		assert((dynticks & 1) == 0);
	fi;
}

/*
 * Base-level NMI runs non-atomically.  Crudely emulates process-level
 * dynticks-idle entry/exit.
 */
proctype base_NMI()
{
	byte busy;

	busy = 0;
	do
	::	if
		:: 1 ->	atomic {
				dynticks = dynticks + 1;
			}
			busy = 0;
		:: 1 ->	skip;
		fi;
		rcu_nmi_enter();
		assert((dynticks & 1) == 1);
		rcu_nmi_exit();
		if
		:: busy -> skip;
		:: !busy ->
			atomic {
				dynticks = dynticks + 1;
			}
			busy = 1;
		fi;
	od;
}

/*
 * Nested NMI runs atomically to emulate interrupting base_level().
 */
proctype nested_NMI()
{
	do
	::	atomic {
			rcu_nmi_enter();
			assert((dynticks & 1) == 1);
			rcu_nmi_exit();
		}
	od;
}

init {
	run base_NMI();
	run nested_NMI();
}

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 8749f43f3f05..fc0236992655 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -759,39 +759,71 @@ void rcu_irq_enter(void)
 /**
  * rcu_nmi_enter - inform RCU of entry to NMI context
  *
- * If the CPU was idle with dynamic ticks active, and there is no
- * irq handler running, this updates rdtp->dynticks_nmi to let the
- * RCU grace-period handling know that the CPU is active.
+ * If the CPU was idle from RCU's viewpoint, update rdtp->dynticks and
+ * rdtp->dynticks_nmi_nesting to let the RCU grace-period handling know
+ * that the CPU is active.  This implementation permits nested NMIs, as
+ * long as the nesting level does not overflow an int.  (You will probably
+ * run out of stack space first.)
  */
 void rcu_nmi_enter(void)
 {
 	struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_dynticks);
+	int incby = 2;
 
-	if (rdtp->dynticks_nmi_nesting == 0 &&
-	    (atomic_read(&rdtp->dynticks) & 0x1))
-		return;
-	rdtp->dynticks_nmi_nesting++;
-	smp_mb__before_atomic();  /* Force delay from prior write. */
-	atomic_inc(&rdtp->dynticks);
-	/* CPUs seeing atomic_inc() must see later RCU read-side crit sects */
-	smp_mb__after_atomic();  /* See above. */
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(!(atomic_read(&rdtp->dynticks) & 0x1));
+	/* Complain about underflow. */
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(rdtp->dynticks_nmi_nesting < 0);
+
+	/*
+	 * If idle from RCU viewpoint, atomically increment ->dynticks
+	 * to mark non-idle and increment ->dynticks_nmi_nesting by one.
+	 * Otherwise, increment ->dynticks_nmi_nesting by two.  This means
+	 * if ->dynticks_nmi_nesting is equal to one, we are guaranteed
+	 * to be in the outermost NMI handler that interrupted an RCU-idle
+	 * period (observation due to Andy Lutomirski).
+	 */
+	if (!(atomic_read(&rdtp->dynticks) & 0x1)) {
+		smp_mb__before_atomic();  /* Force delay from prior write. */
+		atomic_inc(&rdtp->dynticks);
+		/* atomic_inc() before later RCU read-side crit sects */
+		smp_mb__after_atomic();  /* See above. */
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(!(atomic_read(&rdtp->dynticks) & 0x1));
+		incby = 1;
+	}
+	rdtp->dynticks_nmi_nesting += incby;
+	barrier();
 }
 
 /**
  * rcu_nmi_exit - inform RCU of exit from NMI context
  *
- * If the CPU was idle with dynamic ticks active, and there is no
- * irq handler running, this updates rdtp->dynticks_nmi to let the
- * RCU grace-period handling know that the CPU is no longer active.
+ * If we are returning from the outermost NMI handler that interrupted an
+ * RCU-idle period, update rdtp->dynticks and rdtp->dynticks_nmi_nesting
+ * to let the RCU grace-period handling know that the CPU is back to
+ * being RCU-idle.
  */
 void rcu_nmi_exit(void)
 {
 	struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_dynticks);
 
-	if (rdtp->dynticks_nmi_nesting == 0 ||
-	    --rdtp->dynticks_nmi_nesting != 0)
+	/*
+	 * Check for ->dynticks_nmi_nesting underflow and bad ->dynticks.
+	 * (We are exiting an NMI handler, so RCU better be paying attention
+	 * to us!)
+	 */
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(rdtp->dynticks_nmi_nesting <= 0);
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!(atomic_read(&rdtp->dynticks) & 0x1));
+
+	/*
+	 * If the nesting level is not 1, the CPU wasn't RCU-idle, so
+	 * leave it in non-RCU-idle state.
+	 */
+	if (rdtp->dynticks_nmi_nesting != 1) {
+		rdtp->dynticks_nmi_nesting -= 2;
 		return;
+	}
+
+	/* This NMI interrupted an RCU-idle CPU, restore RCU-idleness. */
+	rdtp->dynticks_nmi_nesting = 0;
 	/* CPUs seeing atomic_inc() must see prior RCU read-side crit sects */
 	smp_mb__before_atomic();  /* See above. */
 	atomic_inc(&rdtp->dynticks);


  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-24 23:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-21 21:26 [PATCH v4 0/5] x86: Rework IST interrupts Andy Lutomirski
2014-11-21 21:26 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] uprobes, x86: Fix _TIF_UPROBE vs _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME Andy Lutomirski
2014-11-22 16:55   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-11-24 17:58     ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-11-21 21:26 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] x86, traps: Track entry into and exit from IST context Andy Lutomirski
2014-11-21 21:32   ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-11-21 22:07     ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-11-21 22:19       ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-11-21 22:55         ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-11-21 23:06           ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-11-21 23:38             ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-11-22  2:00               ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-11-22  4:20                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-11-22  5:53                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-11-22 23:41                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-11-24 20:22                       ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-11-24 20:54                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-11-24 21:02                           ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-11-24 21:35                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-11-24 22:34                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-11-24 22:36                                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-11-24 22:57                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-11-24 23:31                                     ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2014-11-24 23:35                                       ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-11-24 23:50                                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-11-24 23:52                                           ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-11-25 18:58                                             ` Borislav Petkov
2014-11-25 19:16                                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-12-11  0:22                                               ` Tony Luck
2014-12-11  0:24                                                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-01-05 21:46                                                   ` Tony Luck
2015-01-05 21:54                                                     ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-01-06  0:44                                                       ` [PATCH] x86, mce: Get rid of TIF_MCE_NOTIFY and associated mce tricks Luck, Tony
2015-01-06  1:01                                                         ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-01-06 18:00                                                           ` Luck, Tony
2015-01-07 12:13                                                             ` Borislav Petkov
2015-01-07 15:51                                                               ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-01-07 15:58                                                                 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-01-07 16:12                                                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-11-25 17:13                                           ` [PATCH v4 2/5] x86, traps: Track entry into and exit from IST context Paul E. McKenney
2014-11-27  7:03                                           ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-11-27 16:46                                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-11-24 21:27                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-11-21 22:20       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-11-21 22:00   ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-11-22 17:20   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-11-24 19:48     ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-01-22 21:52   ` Sasha Levin
2015-01-23 17:58     ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-01-23 18:04       ` Borislav Petkov
2015-01-23 18:34         ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-01-23 20:48           ` Sasha Levin
2015-01-24  1:25             ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-01-28 16:33               ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-01-28 17:48                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-28 21:02                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-01-30 19:57                     ` Sasha Levin
2015-01-31  1:28                       ` Sasha Levin
2015-01-31  3:12                         ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-01-31 12:50                           ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-01-31 13:01                         ` [PATCH] x86, traps: Fix ist_enter from userspace Andy Lutomirski
2015-01-31 15:09                           ` Sasha Levin
2015-01-31 16:18                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-01  2:17                             ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-02-04  6:01                           ` [tip:x86/asm] " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2014-11-21 21:26 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] x86, entry: Switch stacks on a paranoid entry " Andy Lutomirski
2014-11-24 15:55   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-11-21 21:26 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] x86: Clean up current_stack_pointer Andy Lutomirski
2014-11-24 11:39   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-11-21 21:26 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] x86, traps: Add ist_begin_non_atomic and ist_end_non_atomic Andy Lutomirski
2014-11-24 15:54   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-11-24 19:52     ` Andy Lutomirski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141124233101.GA2819@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).