Re: [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86: APIC fixes

Paolo Bonzini
2014-12-01T17:56:33Z

On 01/12/2014 18:55, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> 2014-12-01 17:22+0100, Paolo Bonzini:
>> On 27/11/2014 20:03, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>>> The interesting one is [3/4], which improves upon a previous CVE fix;
>>> we also handle logical destination wrapping in it, so [2/4] does the
>>> same for physical; and to make it nicer, [1/4] removes a condition.
>>> [4/4] makes our fast path return true when the message was handled.
>>>
>>> Radim Krčmář (4):
>>> KVM: x86: deliver phys lowest-prio
>>> KVM: x86: fix APIC physical destination wrapping
>>> KVM: x86: allow 256 logical x2APICs again
>>> KVM: x86: don't retry hopeless APIC delivery
>>>
>>> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
>>> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h | 2 --
>>> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> So the order should be 1/2/5/3/4, right?
>
> It would be safer, thank you.
>
> (And when I look at it now, [4/4] would be better as 1st.)

Ok, applying 4/1/2/5/3.

Paolo