public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
	linux@eikelenboom.it
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 7/7] xen/pciback: Restore configuration space when detaching from a guest.
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 16:59:27 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141201215927.GH24289@laptop.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <547C77E0.5060607@citrix.com>

On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 02:14:56PM +0000, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 21/11/14 22:17, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > The commit "xen/pciback: Don't deadlock when unbinding." was using
> > the version of pci_reset_function which would lock the device lock.
> > That is no good as we can dead-lock. As such we swapped to using
> > the lock-less version and requiring that the callers
> > of 'pcistub_put_pci_dev' take the device lock. And as such
> > this bug got exposed.
> > 
> > Using the lock-less version is  OK, except that we tried to
> > use 'pci_restore_state' after the lock-less version of
> > __pci_reset_function_locked - which won't work as 'state_saved'
> > is set to false. Said 'state_saved' is a toggle boolean that
> > is to be used by the sequence of a) pci_save_state/pci_restore_state
> > or b) pci_load_and_free_saved_state/pci_restore_state. We don't
> > want to use a) as the guest might have messed up the PCI
> > configuration space and we want it to revert to the state
> > when the PCI device was binded to us. Therefore we pick
> > b) to restore the configuration space.
> > 
> > We restore from our 'golden' version of PCI configuration space, when an:
> >  - Device is unbinded from pciback
> >  - Device is detached from a guest.
> > 
> > Reported-by:  Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>
> > Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c
> > index 843a2ba..eb8b58e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c
> > +++ b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c
> > @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static void pcistub_device_release(struct kref *kref)
> >  	 */
> >  	__pci_reset_function_locked(dev);
> >  	if (pci_load_and_free_saved_state(dev, &dev_data->pci_saved_state))
> > -		dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "Could not reload PCI state\n");
> > +		dev_info(&dev->dev, "Could not reload PCI state\n");
> 
> Why dev_info when...
> 
> > @@ -279,9 +281,19 @@ void pcistub_put_pci_dev(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >  	 * (so it's ready for the next domain)
> >  	 */
> >  	device_lock_assert(&dev->dev);
> > -	__pci_reset_function_locked(dev);
> > -	pci_restore_state(dev);
> > -
> > +	dev_data = pci_get_drvdata(dev);
> > +	ret = pci_load_saved_state(dev, dev_data->pci_saved_state);
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> > +		dev_warn(&dev->dev, "Could not reload PCI state\n");
> 
> ... this one is dev_warn?

Should be the same, dev_info I think?
> 
> > +	else {
> > +		__pci_reset_function_locked(dev);
> 
> I think the reset should always be attempted regardless of whether the
> correct state was loaded or not.

/me nods. Will redo it as such.
> 
> David

  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-01 22:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-21 22:17 [PATCH v4] Fixes for PCI backend for 3.19 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-11-21 22:17 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] xen/pciback: Don't deadlock when unbinding Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-11-21 22:17 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] driver core: Provide an wrapper around the mutex to do lockdep warnings Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-11-21 22:17 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] xen/pciback: Include the domain id if removing the device whilst still in use Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-11-21 22:17 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] xen/pciback: Print out the domain owning the device Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-11-21 22:17 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] xen/pciback: Remove tons of dereferences Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-11-21 22:17 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] PCI: Expose pci_load_saved_state for public consumption Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-11-21 22:17 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] xen/pciback: Restore configuration space when detaching from a guest Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-12-01 14:14   ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2014-12-01 21:59     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2014-12-02 23:11   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-12-03 15:52     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-12-02 10:10 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4] Fixes for PCI backend for 3.19 Jan Beulich
2014-12-02 15:05   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-12-02 15:09     ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141201215927.GH24289@laptop.dumpdata.com \
    --to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@eikelenboom.it \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox