From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Fix an off-by-one bug in __domain_mapping()
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 13:04:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141202120430.GA32294@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1417516475.5525.57.camel@infradead.org>
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 10:34:35AM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> __domain_mapping() is an amalgamation of the old domain_pfn_mapping()
> and domain_sg_mapping() functions. When I did that, in commit 9051aa026,
> the 'sg_res' variable was used *only* for tracking how many pages were
> left in the current scatterlist element, before we had to get the next
> one from the sglist.
>
> For reasons which are lost now, in the case of a simple pfn range I was
> setting 'sg_res = nr_pages + 1' to ensure that we *never* got down to
> sg_res=0 and tried to look for more from the (non-existent, in this
> case) sglist.
>
> Later in commit 6dd9a7c73 we added large page support, using sg_res in a
> way which actually required it to be accurate. And now we have an
> off-by-one because we'll actually *try* to use a 2GiB large page for a
> mapping of size 0x1ff000, because of that '+1'.
>
> The BUG_ON is entirely correct here, and correctly highlighted the
> problem.
>
> However, the +1 is no longer necessary, because the check that needed it
> was also modified to read 'if (sg_res && nr_pages)', which is perfectly
> sufficient and arguably how it should have been done in the first place.
>
> I had an almost identical patch last week for internal testing, because
> I stupidly hadn't noticed that Jiang had beaten me to it.
>
> Acked-By: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
>
> > > This issue was introduced in v2.6.31, but intel-iommu.c has
> > > been moved into drivers/iommu in v3.1. So what's the preferred way
> > > to deal with stable kernels between v2.6.31 and v3.1?
> >
> > Just remove the kernel version marker from the stable tag. The stable
> > kernel maintainers for kernels >3.1 will ask you to backport the patch
> > or just backport it by themselfes.
>
> I think this is only an issue since commit 6dd9a7c737 added super page
> support in 3.0, isn't it? Before that, the +1 was *needed*.
Okay guys, thanks for the explanations. I applied the patch to the
x86/vt-d branch and changed the stable tag to >= 3.0.
Joerg
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-02 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-26 1:42 [PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Fix an off-by-one bug in __domain_mapping() Jiang Liu
2014-12-01 16:27 ` Joerg Roedel
2014-12-02 0:06 ` Jiang Liu
2014-12-02 10:34 ` David Woodhouse
2014-12-02 12:04 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141202120430.GA32294@8bytes.org \
--to=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox