From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
linux@eikelenboom.it
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 7/7] xen/pciback: Restore configuration space when detaching from a guest.
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 10:52:08 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141203155208.GC3081@laptop.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <547E4736.5000303@oracle.com>
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 06:11:50PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 11/21/2014 05:17 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >The commit "xen/pciback: Don't deadlock when unbinding." was using
> >the version of pci_reset_function which would lock the device lock.
> >That is no good as we can dead-lock. As such we swapped to using
> >the lock-less version and requiring that the callers
> >of 'pcistub_put_pci_dev' take the device lock. And as such
> >this bug got exposed.
> >
> >Using the lock-less version is OK, except that we tried to
> >use 'pci_restore_state' after the lock-less version of
> >__pci_reset_function_locked - which won't work as 'state_saved'
> >is set to false. Said 'state_saved' is a toggle boolean that
> >is to be used by the sequence of a) pci_save_state/pci_restore_state
> >or b) pci_load_and_free_saved_state/pci_restore_state. We don't
> >want to use a) as the guest might have messed up the PCI
> >configuration space and we want it to revert to the state
> >when the PCI device was binded to us. Therefore we pick
> >b) to restore the configuration space.
>
>
> Doesn't this all mean that patch 1/7 broke pcistub_put_pci_dev()?
It fixed it (there was a deadlock there).
But the fix to the dead-lock exposed this bug.
One could say that 1/7 broke it because it never worked in the
first place, but now that it works (thanks to #1) - it did not
work right?
Squashing the patches together is a bit too much I fear.
>
> -boris
>
>
> >
> >We restore from our 'golden' version of PCI configuration space, when an:
> > - Device is unbinded from pciback
> > - Device is detached from a guest.
> >
> >Reported-by: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>
> >Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
> >---
> > drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c
> >index 843a2ba..eb8b58e 100644
> >--- a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c
> >+++ b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c
> >@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static void pcistub_device_release(struct kref *kref)
> > */
> > __pci_reset_function_locked(dev);
> > if (pci_load_and_free_saved_state(dev, &dev_data->pci_saved_state))
> >- dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "Could not reload PCI state\n");
> >+ dev_info(&dev->dev, "Could not reload PCI state\n");
> > else
> > pci_restore_state(dev);
> >@@ -257,6 +257,8 @@ void pcistub_put_pci_dev(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > {
> > struct pcistub_device *psdev, *found_psdev = NULL;
> > unsigned long flags;
> >+ struct xen_pcibk_dev_data *dev_data;
> >+ int ret;
> > spin_lock_irqsave(&pcistub_devices_lock, flags);
> >@@ -279,9 +281,19 @@ void pcistub_put_pci_dev(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > * (so it's ready for the next domain)
> > */
> > device_lock_assert(&dev->dev);
> >- __pci_reset_function_locked(dev);
> >- pci_restore_state(dev);
> >-
> >+ dev_data = pci_get_drvdata(dev);
> >+ ret = pci_load_saved_state(dev, dev_data->pci_saved_state);
> >+ if (ret < 0)
> >+ dev_warn(&dev->dev, "Could not reload PCI state\n");
> >+ else {
> >+ __pci_reset_function_locked(dev);
> >+ /*
> >+ * The usual sequence is pci_save_state & pci_restore_state
> >+ * but the guest might have messed the configuration space up.
> >+ * Use the initial version (when device was bound to us).
> >+ */
> >+ pci_restore_state(dev);
> >+ }
> > /* This disables the device. */
> > xen_pcibk_reset_device(dev);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-03 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-21 22:17 [PATCH v4] Fixes for PCI backend for 3.19 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-11-21 22:17 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] xen/pciback: Don't deadlock when unbinding Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-11-21 22:17 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] driver core: Provide an wrapper around the mutex to do lockdep warnings Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-11-21 22:17 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] xen/pciback: Include the domain id if removing the device whilst still in use Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-11-21 22:17 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] xen/pciback: Print out the domain owning the device Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-11-21 22:17 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] xen/pciback: Remove tons of dereferences Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-11-21 22:17 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] PCI: Expose pci_load_saved_state for public consumption Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-11-21 22:17 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] xen/pciback: Restore configuration space when detaching from a guest Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-12-01 14:14 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2014-12-01 21:59 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-12-02 23:11 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-12-03 15:52 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2014-12-02 10:10 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4] Fixes for PCI backend for 3.19 Jan Beulich
2014-12-02 15:05 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-12-02 15:09 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141203155208.GC3081@laptop.dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@eikelenboom.it \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox