From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] misc: suppress build warning
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 08:30:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141204163032.GA29076@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+V-a8vH9McTLVSWhQZun04AP7SZ7wGHeobBK1hA+EKn5fYgKw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 03:13:00PM +0000, Prabhakar Lad wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > On Thursday 04 December 2014 14:38:30 Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
> >> this patch fixes following build warning:
> >>
> >> drivers/misc/ioc4.c: In function ‘ioc4_probe’:
> >> drivers/misc/ioc4.c:194:16: warning: ‘start’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> >> period = (end - start) /
> >> ^
> >> drivers/misc/ioc4.c:148:11: note: ‘start’ was declared here
> >> uint64_t start, end, period;
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
> >
> > Please explain why the compiler thinks there is a bug, why you
> > are sure that there isn't, and why you picked '0' as the
> > initialization value.
> >
> Its a false positive, to suppress the warning '0' was picked.
Are you _sure_ it's a false positive? That odd do/while loop looks like
it might just not ever initialize the start variable, are you sure the
logic there is correct?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-04 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-04 14:38 [PATCH] misc: suppress build warning Lad, Prabhakar
2014-12-04 14:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-04 15:13 ` Prabhakar Lad
2014-12-04 16:30 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2014-12-05 7:37 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141204163032.GA29076@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox