From: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
To: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@chromium.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
pawel.moll@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk,
galak@codeaurora.org, Nathan Lynch <Nathan_Lynch@mentor.com>,
robh+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] clocksource: arch_timer: Allow the device tree to specify uninitialized timer registers
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 23:34:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141205073425.GF29274@quad.lixom.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1412753627-28287-1-git-send-email-sonnyrao@chromium.org>
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 12:33:47AM -0700, Sonny Rao wrote:
> From: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
>
> Some 32-bit (ARMv7) systems are architected like this:
>
> * The firmware doesn't know and doesn't care about hypervisor mode and
> we don't want to add the complexity of hypervisor there.
>
> * The firmware isn't involved in SMP bringup or resume.
>
> * The ARCH timer come up with an uninitialized offset (CNTVOFF)
> between the virtual and physical counters. Each core gets a
> different random offset.
>
> * The device boots in "Secure SVC" mode.
>
> * Nothing has touched the reset value of CNTHCTL.PL1PCEN or
> CNTHCTL.PL1PCTEN (both default to 1 at reset)
>
> On systems like the above, it doesn't make sense to use the virtual
> counter. There's nobody managing the offset and each time a core goes
> down and comes back up it will get reinitialized to some other random
> value.
>
> This adds an optional property which can inform the kernel of this
> situation, and firmware is free to remove the property if it is going
> to initialize the CNTVOFF registers when each CPU comes out of reset.
>
> Currently, the best course of action in this case is to use the
> physical timer, which is why it is important that CNTHCTL hasn't been
> changed from its reset value and it's a reasonable assumption given
> that the firmware has never entered HYP mode.
>
> Note that it's been said that on ARMv8 systems the firmware and
> kernel really can't be architected as described above. That means
> using the physical timer like this really only makes sense for ARMv7
> systems.
>
> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Add "#ifdef CONFIG_ARM" as per Will Deacon
>
> Changes in v3:
> - change property name to arm,cntvoff-not-fw-configured and specify
> that the value of CNTHCTL.PL1PC(T)EN must still be the reset value
> of 1 as per Mark Rutland
>
> Changes in v4:
> - change property name to arm,cpu-registers-not-fw-configured and
> specify that all cpu registers must have architected reset values
> per Mark Rutland
> - change from "#ifdef CONFIG_ARM" to "if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM))" per
> Arnd Bergmann
Applied to next/drivers (and next/dt for rk3288 dependency). Thanks, all!
-Olof
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-05 7:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-08 7:33 [PATCH v4] clocksource: arch_timer: Allow the device tree to specify uninitialized timer registers Sonny Rao
2014-11-19 23:01 ` Doug Anderson
2014-11-23 21:41 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-11-26 11:51 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-11-26 12:06 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-11-26 12:30 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-11-26 12:48 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-11-26 12:49 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-11-26 12:55 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-11-26 12:53 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-11-26 12:49 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-11-28 14:16 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-11-26 14:41 ` Yingjoe Chen
2014-11-26 16:14 ` Doug Anderson
2014-11-27 2:27 ` Yingjoe Chen
2014-12-05 7:34 ` Olof Johansson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141205073425.GF29274@quad.lixom.net \
--to=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=Mark.Rutland@arm.com \
--cc=Nathan_Lynch@mentor.com \
--cc=Sudeep.Holla@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sonnyrao@chromium.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox