From: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: "Benjamin Herrenschmidt" <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Gavin Shan" <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Marek Kordík" <kordikmarek@gmail.com>,
"Alexey Voronkov" <zermond@gmail.com>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Clear bridge MEM_64 flag if one child does not support it
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 11:11:19 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141209001119.GA24661@shangw> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE9FiQX-vMu5+Kr09ngr95WvtoZTUSL5R2+NiVFeiN6q-BXLLg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 03:59:54PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
><benh@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 13:52 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>> 2. or scan the children resource other than ROM to clear bridge MEM_64
>>> for mmio pref.
>>>
>>> The patch is using second way so will keep child mmio pref into bridge
>>> mmio pref range.
>>
>> That means that having a single ROM BAR that is 32-bit and prefetchable
>> will downgrade the entire window to 32-bit ? That's not going to work
>> either.
>
>the ROM BAR get skipped during the checking.
>
>+ if (i != PCI_ROM_RESOURCE)
>+ mem64_mask &= r->flags & IORESOURCE_MEM_64;
>+ }
>
>>
>> I have GPUs with 16G BARs for example... suddenly they don't fit
>> anaymore because we downgraded the window to 32 bit because somewhere
>> there's a 32-bit pref resource ?
>>
>> That will break more than it fixes...
>
>Please check if this patch break your platform. I tried on my setup on
>x86. and it is still
>working on 64 bit resource allocation.
>
I'm going to give it a spin and Richard, could you please apply Yinghai's
patch to see if your SRIOV code can work properly?
Thanks,
Gavin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-09 0:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-08 21:52 [PATCH] PCI: Clear bridge MEM_64 flag if one child does not support it Yinghai Lu
2014-12-08 22:56 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-12-08 23:00 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-12-09 0:09 ` Yinghai Lu
2014-12-09 21:39 ` Yinghai Lu
2014-12-08 23:59 ` Yinghai Lu
2014-12-09 0:11 ` Gavin Shan [this message]
2014-12-09 2:26 ` Wei Yang
2014-12-09 7:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2014-12-09 7:56 ` Wei Yang
2014-12-09 18:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-12-10 9:42 ` Wei Yang
2014-12-09 19:49 ` Yinghai Lu
2014-12-09 18:07 ` Marek Kordík
2014-12-09 18:22 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-12-09 19:42 ` Yinghai Lu
2014-12-09 22:15 ` Marek Kordík
2014-12-09 23:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2014-12-09 1:08 ` Gavin Shan
2014-12-09 1:38 ` Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141209001119.GA24661@shangw \
--to=gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=kordikmarek@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
--cc=zermond@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox