Re: [PATCH V5 0/3] perf tool: Haswell LBR call stack support (user)

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>]

Em Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 01:53:05PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 09:27:08AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 04:18:56PM +0000, Liang, Kan escreveu:
> > > > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:51:42PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > > > Em Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 02:49:52PM +0000, Liang, Kan escreveu:
> > > > > > Jiri Wrote:
> > > > > > > looks ok to me..
> > > > > > Thanks for the review.
> > > > > > > I'll test it once I get hands on Haswel server again, I guess we
> > > > > > > wait for the kernel change to go in first anyway, right?
> > > > > > I'm not sure, let's ask Peter.
> > > > > > Peter?
> > > > > Would be good to go in one pull request, so that whoever pulls it has
> > > > > the chance to test the kernel feature with the accompanying tooling bits.
> > > > also there's user part dependency on kernel.. soem new define IIRC
> > > Oh, right. We have to let them go in together.
> > The ones that are just prep patches I am merging now, Jiri, can I stick
> > an Acked-by to the non-LBR related ones?
 
> I guess u mean just this one? 
> 2803   T Dec 02 kan.liang@intel (3.4K) ├─>[PATCH V5 2/3] perf tool: Move cpumode resolve code to add_callchain_ip

There is another I split from, iirc 1/3, that is unrelated to that
patch, fixing '-g fp' usage that became invalid after a patch from you:

https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/commit/?h=perf/core&id=f70b4e39de4ef25aade966c0dfc69cfb97091be9
 
> yep, ack
> 
> jirka
> 
> >  
> > > I have verified that the V8 kernel part patch is compatible with both latest
> > > tip and latest perf/core. We don't need to rebase.
> > > The user perf tool for tip is not updated yet. We need to merge latest
> > > perf/core to tip before applying user part patch.
> > > 
> > > Do you have more comments for the code?
> > > 
> > > The latest kernel and user part codes are here.
> > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/6/432
> > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/2/396
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Kan