From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756933AbaLINLP (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2014 08:11:15 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.19.201]:33759 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755234AbaLINLO (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2014 08:11:14 -0500 Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 10:11:04 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Jiri Olsa Cc: "Liang, Kan" , "a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl" , "eranian@google.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "mingo@redhat.com" , "paulus@samba.org" , "ak@linux.intel.com" , "namhyung@kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/3] perf tool: Haswell LBR call stack support (user) Message-ID: <20141209131104.GC4189@kernel.org> References: <1417532814-26208-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com> <20141204142330.GB10406@krava.brq.redhat.com> <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F0770167D124@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> <20141204155142.GD18689@kernel.org> <20141204160213.GB18631@krava.brq.redhat.com> <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F0770167E1F0@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> <20141209122708.GA4189@kernel.org> <20141209125305.GE2516@krava.brq.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20141209125305.GE2516@krava.brq.redhat.com> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 01:53:05PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 09:27:08AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 04:18:56PM +0000, Liang, Kan escreveu: > > > > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:51:42PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > > > Em Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 02:49:52PM +0000, Liang, Kan escreveu: > > > > > > Jiri Wrote: > > > > > > > looks ok to me.. > > > > > > Thanks for the review. > > > > > > > I'll test it once I get hands on Haswel server again, I guess we > > > > > > > wait for the kernel change to go in first anyway, right? > > > > > > I'm not sure, let's ask Peter. > > > > > > Peter? > > > > > Would be good to go in one pull request, so that whoever pulls it has > > > > > the chance to test the kernel feature with the accompanying tooling bits. > > > > also there's user part dependency on kernel.. soem new define IIRC > > > Oh, right. We have to let them go in together. > > The ones that are just prep patches I am merging now, Jiri, can I stick > > an Acked-by to the non-LBR related ones? > I guess u mean just this one? > 2803 T Dec 02 kan.liang@intel (3.4K) ├─>[PATCH V5 2/3] perf tool: Move cpumode resolve code to add_callchain_ip There is another I split from, iirc 1/3, that is unrelated to that patch, fixing '-g fp' usage that became invalid after a patch from you: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/commit/?h=perf/core&id=f70b4e39de4ef25aade966c0dfc69cfb97091be9 > yep, ack > > jirka > > > > > > I have verified that the V8 kernel part patch is compatible with both latest > > > tip and latest perf/core. We don't need to rebase. > > > The user perf tool for tip is not updated yet. We need to merge latest > > > perf/core to tip before applying user part patch. > > > > > > Do you have more comments for the code? > > > > > > The latest kernel and user part codes are here. > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/6/432 > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/2/396 > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Kan