From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759048AbaLKUqB (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Dec 2014 15:46:01 -0500 Received: from 251.110.2.81.in-addr.arpa ([81.2.110.251]:38932 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758664AbaLKUqA (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Dec 2014 15:46:00 -0500 Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 20:40:30 +0000 From: One Thousand Gnomes To: kbuild test robot Cc: Alan Tull , kbuild-all@01.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH socfpga-nex] staging: fpga manager: socfpga_fpga_ops can be static Message-ID: <20141211204030.42c33e71@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20141211014324.GA73956@lkp-sb04> References: <201412110903.GCuPHwdi%fengguang.wu@intel.com> <20141211014324.GA73956@lkp-sb04> Organization: Intel Corporation X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.24; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:43:24 +0800 kbuild test robot wrote: > drivers/staging/fpga/socfpga.c:655:25: sparse: symbol 'socfpga_fpga_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? > > Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu Ought to be const as well by the look of it - we don't want function pointers in patchable memory spaces.