From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] tracepoints: Do not use call_rcu_sched() before early_initcall()
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 10:08:54 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141214180854.GC5310@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141214115332.76be1b8b@gandalf.local.home>
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 11:53:32AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Dec 2014 11:41:05 -0500
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
>
> > From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> >
> > In order to move enabling of trace events to just after mm_init(), the
> > tracepoint enable code can not use call_rcu_sched() because rcu isn't
> > even initialized yet. Since this can only happen before SMP is set up
> > (and even before interrupts are set up), there's no reason to use
> > call_rcu_sched() at this point.
> >
> > Instead, create a variable called tracepoint_rcu_safe that gets enabled
> > via early_initcall() and if that is not set, free the code directly
> > instead of using call_rcu_sched().
> >
> > This allows us to enable tracepoints early without issues.
> >
> > Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
> > Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
With the addition of read_mostly, and given that I am not going to mess
with call_rcu() this late in the 3.19 process without a blazingly good
reason:
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Please note that you can use call_rcu() and friends as soon as rcu_init()
returns. The callbacks won't be invoked until early_initcall() time,
but they will be properly queued.
Please note also that there are places where turning a call_rcu() into
a direct function call don't work, even at times when preemption is
disabled and there is only one CPU. One example is where single-threaded
code uses call_rcu() on a list element of a list that it is traversing
within an RCU read-side critical section. A direct call to the RCU
callback could potentially destroy the pointers that the traversal was
going to use to find the next element. This means that we cannot make
call_rcu() do direct calls to the callback, as that would break quite
a bit of existing code.
Is there some definite point during boot before which you won't need to
invoke call_rcu_sched() for tracing? I am guessing "no", but have to ask.
I can probably make call_rcu_sched() work arbitrarily early, but it is a
bit uglier. And this assumes that irqs_disabled_flags(local_irq_save())
returns true during early boot. I would -hope- this would be true! ;-)
Thanx, Paul
> > ---
> > kernel/tracepoint.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/tracepoint.c b/kernel/tracepoint.c
> > index 3490407dc7b7..9b90ef0ac731 100644
> > --- a/kernel/tracepoint.c
> > +++ b/kernel/tracepoint.c
> > @@ -33,6 +33,15 @@ extern struct tracepoint * const __stop___tracepoints_ptrs[];
> > /* Set to 1 to enable tracepoint debug output */
> > static const int tracepoint_debug;
> >
> > +/*
> > + * traceoint_rcu_is_safe is set to true at early_initcall().
> > + * Tracepoints can be enabled before rcu is initialized.
> > + * When that happens, there's no reason to free via call_rcu()
> > + * because the system isn't even in SMP mode yet, and rcu isn't
> > + * initialized. Just directly free the old tracepoints instead.
> > + */
> > +static bool tracepoint_rcu_is_safe;
>
> Hmm, I probably should make this read_mostly.
>
> Although, it's not a hot path. Still, it gets set once at boot up and
> never touched again. Yeah, that deserves a read_mostly.
>
> -- Steve
>
> > +
> > #ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
> > /*
> > * Tracepoint module list mutex protects the local module list.
> > @@ -76,7 +85,16 @@ static inline void release_probes(struct tracepoint_func *old)
> > if (old) {
> > struct tp_probes *tp_probes = container_of(old,
> > struct tp_probes, probes[0]);
> > - call_rcu_sched(&tp_probes->rcu, rcu_free_old_probes);
> > + /*
> > + * Tracepoints can be enabled before RCU is initialized
> > + * at boot up. If that is the case, do not bother using
> > + * call_rcu() (because that will fail), but instead just
> > + * free directly.
> > + */
> > + if (likely(tracepoint_rcu_is_safe))
> > + call_rcu_sched(&tp_probes->rcu, rcu_free_old_probes);
> > + else
> > + rcu_free_old_probes(&tp_probes->rcu);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > @@ -518,3 +536,10 @@ void syscall_unregfunc(void)
> > }
> > }
> > #endif
> > +
> > +static __init int init_tracepoint_rcu(void)
> > +{
> > + tracepoint_rcu_is_safe = true;
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +early_initcall(init_tracepoint_rcu);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-14 18:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-14 16:41 [PATCH 0/3] tracing: Enable tracepoints early and allow printk to use them Steven Rostedt
2014-12-14 16:41 ` [PATCH 1/3] tracepoints: Do not use call_rcu_sched() before early_initcall() Steven Rostedt
2014-12-14 16:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-12-14 18:08 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2014-12-14 18:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-12-14 18:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-12-14 18:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-12-14 20:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-12-14 17:05 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-12-14 17:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-12-14 17:21 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-12-14 17:29 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-12-14 17:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-12-14 18:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-12-14 16:41 ` [PATCH 2/3] tracing: Move enabling tracepoints to just after mm_init() Steven Rostedt
2014-12-14 18:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-12-14 18:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-12-14 20:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-12-14 16:41 ` [PATCH 3/3] tracing: Add tp_printk cmdline to have tracepoints go to printk() Steven Rostedt
2014-12-14 17:07 ` [PATCH 0/3] tracing: Enable tracepoints early and allow printk to use them Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141214180854.GC5310@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox