public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	mingo@elte.hu, ak@linux.intel.com, jolsa@redhat.com,
	dsahern@gmail.com, dzickus@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org,
	jmario@redhat.com, rfowles@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf mem: enable simultaneous sampling of loads/stores
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 18:44:49 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141216204449.GA9327@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141216165358.GA9310@thinkpad>

Em Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 05:53:58PM +0100, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
> 
> This patch modifies perf mem to default to sampling loads
> and stores simultaneously. It could only do one or the other
> before yet there was not hardware restriction preventing
> simultaneous collection. With this patch, one run is sufficient
> to collect both.
> 
> By default load/stores are sampled now:
> $ perf mem rec
> $ perf mem rep
> 
> It is still possible to sample only loads or stores by using the
> -t option:
>  $ perf mem -t load rec
>  $ perf mem -t load rep
> Or
>  $ perf mem -t store rec
>  $ perf mem -t store rep
> 
> The perf report TUI will show one event at a time. The store
> output will contain a Weight column which will be empty.

Can you please update the man page and resubmit?

Are those unchecked strdups really needed?

- Arnaldo
 
> Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/builtin-mem.c | 107 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 92 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-mem.c b/tools/perf/builtin-mem.c
> index 24db6ff..52dbaae 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-mem.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-mem.c
> @@ -7,10 +7,13 @@
>  #include "util/session.h"
>  #include "util/data.h"
>  
> -#define MEM_OPERATION_LOAD	"load"
> -#define MEM_OPERATION_STORE	"store"
> +#define MEM_OPERATION_LOAD	0x1
> +#define MEM_OPERATION_STORE	0x2
>  
> -static const char	*mem_operation		= MEM_OPERATION_LOAD;
> +/*
> + * default to both load an store sampling
> + */
> +static int mem_operation = MEM_OPERATION_LOAD | MEM_OPERATION_STORE;
>  
>  struct perf_mem {
>  	struct perf_tool	tool;
> @@ -25,26 +28,30 @@ static int __cmd_record(int argc, const char **argv)
>  {
>  	int rec_argc, i = 0, j;
>  	const char **rec_argv;
> -	char event[64];
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	rec_argc = argc + 4;
> +	rec_argc = argc + 7; /* max number of arguments */
>  	rec_argv = calloc(rec_argc + 1, sizeof(char *));
>  	if (!rec_argv)
>  		return -1;
>  
>  	rec_argv[i++] = strdup("record");
> -	if (!strcmp(mem_operation, MEM_OPERATION_LOAD))
> +
> +	if (mem_operation & MEM_OPERATION_LOAD)
>  		rec_argv[i++] = strdup("-W");
> +
>  	rec_argv[i++] = strdup("-d");
> -	rec_argv[i++] = strdup("-e");
>  
> -	if (strcmp(mem_operation, MEM_OPERATION_LOAD))
> -		sprintf(event, "cpu/mem-stores/pp");
> -	else
> -		sprintf(event, "cpu/mem-loads/pp");
> +	if (mem_operation & MEM_OPERATION_LOAD) {
> +		rec_argv[i++] = strdup("-e");
> +		rec_argv[i++] = strdup("cpu/mem-loads/pp");
> +	}
> +
> +	if (mem_operation & MEM_OPERATION_STORE) {
> +		rec_argv[i++] = strdup("-e");
> +		rec_argv[i++] = strdup("cpu/mem-stores/pp");
> +	}
>  
> -	rec_argv[i++] = strdup(event);
>  	for (j = 1; j < argc; j++, i++)
>  		rec_argv[i] = argv[j];
>  
> @@ -170,7 +177,7 @@ static int report_events(int argc, const char **argv, struct perf_mem *mem)
>  	 * there is no weight (cost) associated with stores, so don't print
>  	 * the column
>  	 */
> -	if (strcmp(mem_operation, MEM_OPERATION_LOAD))
> +	if (!(mem_operation & MEM_OPERATION_LOAD))
>  		rep_argv[i++] = strdup("--sort=mem,sym,dso,symbol_daddr,"
>  				       "dso_daddr,tlb,locked");
>  
> @@ -182,6 +189,75 @@ static int report_events(int argc, const char **argv, struct perf_mem *mem)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +struct mem_mode {
> +	const char *name;
> +	int mode;
> +};
> +
> +#define MEM_OPT(n, m) \
> +	{ .name = n, .mode = (m) }
> +
> +#define MEM_END { .name = NULL }
> +
> +static const struct mem_mode mem_modes[]={
> +	MEM_OPT("load", MEM_OPERATION_LOAD),
> +	MEM_OPT("store", MEM_OPERATION_STORE),
> +	MEM_END
> +};
> +
> +static int
> +parse_mem_ops(const struct option *opt, const char *str, int unset)
> +{
> +	int *mode = (int *)opt->value;
> +	const struct mem_mode *m;
> +	char *s, *os = NULL, *p;
> +	int ret = -1;
> +
> +	if (unset)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/* str may be NULL in case no arg is passed to -t */
> +	if (str) {
> +		/* because str is read-only */
> +		s = os = strdup(str);
> +		if (!s)
> +			return -1;
> +
> +		/* reset mode */
> +		*mode = 0;
> +
> +		for (;;) {
> +			p = strchr(s, ',');
> +			if (p)
> +				*p = '\0';
> +
> +			for (m = mem_modes; m->name; m++) {
> +				if (!strcasecmp(s, m->name))
> +					break;
> +			}
> +			if (!m->name) {
> +				fprintf(stderr, "unknown sampling op %s,"
> +					    " check man page\n", s);
> +				goto error;
> +			}
> +
> +			*mode |= m->mode;
> +
> +			if (!p)
> +				break;
> +
> +			s = p + 1;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	ret = 0;
> +
> +	if (*mode == 0)
> +		*mode = MEM_OPERATION_LOAD;
> +error:
> +	free(os);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  int cmd_mem(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __maybe_unused)
>  {
>  	struct stat st;
> @@ -199,8 +275,9 @@ int cmd_mem(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __maybe_unused)
>  		.input_name		 = "perf.data",
>  	};
>  	const struct option mem_options[] = {
> -	OPT_STRING('t', "type", &mem_operation,
> -		   "type", "memory operations(load/store)"),
> +	OPT_CALLBACK('t', "type", &mem_operation,
> +		   "type", "memory operations(load,store) Default load,store",
> +		    parse_mem_ops),
>  	OPT_BOOLEAN('D', "dump-raw-samples", &mem.dump_raw,
>  		    "dump raw samples in ASCII"),
>  	OPT_BOOLEAN('U', "hide-unresolved", &mem.hide_unresolved,
> -- 
> 1.9.1

  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-16 20:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-16 16:53 [PATCH] perf mem: enable simultaneous sampling of loads/stores Stephane Eranian
2014-12-16 20:44 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2014-12-16 21:00   ` Stephane Eranian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141216204449.GA9327@redhat.com \
    --to=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=jmario@redhat.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rfowles@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox