From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
"Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, LKP <lkp@01.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [nohz] 2a16fc93d2c: kernel lockup on idle injection
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 13:47:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141217124724.GB20739@lerouge> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1412171008260.17382@nanos>
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:11:58AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Dec 2014, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:21:27PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > So instead of evaluating the whole nonsense a gazillion times in a row
> > > and firing pointless self ipis why are you not looking at the obvious
> > > solution of sane state change tracking?
> >
> > Because I had to do it wrong first before somebody like you with a fresh mind
> > comes, look at the whole picture and propose a rethink :-)
>
> Point taken.
>
> > > I told all of you from the very beginning that remote accounting
> > > is a key mechanism for this, but you keep insisting on hacking
> > > around it.
> >
> > I don't, and I think everybody has understood we are not going to accept
> > hacks to solve the 1hz issue.
>
> You wish.
>
> > I'm pretty sure you know what this is about to maintain a project with a
> > (variably) cruel lack of manpower ;-)
>
> Oh yes! :(
>
> > Moreover I'm not the kind of kernel developer who ignores reviews (whether pre or
> > post merge).
>
> I know that.
>
> > So, no point in threatening a dependency to BROKEN or ripping out except perhaps to
> > push me out to other projects with more thankful managers.
>
> This was not directed to you, really.
>
> This was directed at the folks who randomly "fix" that code by voodoo
> bandaids instead of analyzing the root causes in the first
> place. You're the least one to blame for that.
Well I was about to propose a bad fix for powerclamp and I sometimes take
overengineering directions. I'm still to blame for several things 8-)
Sorry I got too touchy :-)
Anyway, I'll give a try to your proposition. Somehow I have always felt that
something was wrong with this tick_nohz_can_stop_tick() called all over the place,
that plus the IPI that's often near the scheduler IPI.
I'm pretty sure this is going to help fixing some overhead issues I got reported.
Thanks a lot!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-17 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-11 19:42 [nohz] 2a16fc93d2c: kernel lockup on idle injection Fengguang Wu
2014-12-12 11:57 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-12-15 7:25 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-12-15 9:32 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-12-15 9:43 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-12-15 21:24 ` Pan, Jacob jun
2014-12-16 4:18 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-12-16 17:15 ` Jacob Pan
2014-12-16 21:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-12-15 23:44 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-12-16 4:53 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-12-16 9:36 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-12-16 12:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-12-16 14:20 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-12-16 14:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-12-16 21:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-12-16 22:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-12-16 22:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-12-17 0:26 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-12-17 0:12 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-12-17 9:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-12-17 12:47 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2014-12-16 14:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-12-16 14:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-12-16 16:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-12-17 12:31 ` Preeti Murthy
2014-12-17 15:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141217124724.GB20739@lerouge \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@01.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox