From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751614AbaLRFEo (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2014 00:04:44 -0500 Received: from LGEMRELSE7Q.lge.com ([156.147.1.151]:37372 "EHLO lgemrelse7q.lge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750720AbaLRFEn (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2014 00:04:43 -0500 X-Original-SENDERIP: 10.177.222.235 X-Original-MAILFROM: namhyung@kernel.org Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:04:59 +0900 From: Namhyung Kim To: David Ahern Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa , Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools lib traceevent: Add support for IP address formats Message-ID: <20141218050459.GD20215@sejong> References: <1418848148-35919-1-git-send-email-dsahern@gmail.com> <20141218042632.GB20215@sejong> <549258DB.1010408@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <549258DB.1010408@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 09:32:27PM -0700, David Ahern wrote: > On 12/17/14 9:26 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > > >It'd be better if we do it like below.. > > > > char i = *ptr++; > > > >Why not passing ptr + 1 to print_ip_arg()? > > > > That parsing loop is a bit weird - and deep. And I only wanted to consume > 'pi' and 'pI' with parse_ip_arg if and only if the next letters are '4', '6' > and 'S'. Yeah, I know - but I still think you can pass ptr + 1 (but not update ptr) since everytime you only access to ptr + 1 unless I missed it. Consuming ptr depends on the return value so it's irrelevant whether you pass ptr or (ptr + 1) IMHO. Thanks, Namhyung