From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751416AbaLRPKk (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2014 10:10:40 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:60607 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751078AbaLRPKi (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2014 10:10:38 -0500 Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 16:10:20 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Jiri Olsa Cc: mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Frederic Weisbecker , Steven Rostedt , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf ftrace: Factor regs retrieval for function tracer Message-ID: <20141218151020.GF30905@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20141216115041.GW3337@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20141217143105.GG18257@krava.brq.redhat.com> <20141217153508.GC30905@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20141217154507.GA20471@krava.brq.redhat.com> <20141218140847.GA18898@krava.brq.redhat.com> <20141218142027.GE30905@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20141218142827.GB18898@krava.brq.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141218142827.GB18898@krava.brq.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 03:28:27PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > Would not something like: > > > > struct pt_regs *regs; > > > > entry = perf_trace_buf_prepare(ENTRY_SIZE, TRACE_FN, ®s, &rctx); > > if (!pt_regs) { > > perf_fetch_caller_regs(regs); > > pt_regs = regs; > > } > > > > Be simpler? > > well, I wanted to omit touching the '__perf_regs' var > in perf_trace_buf_prepare: > > if (regs) > *regs = this_cpu_ptr(&__perf_regs[*rctxp]); OK, fair enough I suppose. Thanks!