From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
To: Robert Baldyga <r.baldyga@samsung.com>
Cc: Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>, <balbi@ti.com>,
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
<k.opasiak@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: udc-core: call udc_stop() before gadget unbind
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 10:34:30 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141222163430.GH12815@saruman> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <548EB262.6040208@samsung.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1676 bytes --]
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:05:22AM +0100, Robert Baldyga wrote:
> On 12/15/2014 06:13 AM, Peter Chen wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 02:17:28PM +0100, Robert Baldyga wrote:
> >> As usb function drivers assumes that all usb request will be completed
> >> before function unbind call, we should supply such behavior. In some
> >> cases ep_disable() won't kill all request effectively, because some
> >> IN requests can be in running state. In such situation it's possible
> >> to have unbind function called before last request completion, which
> >> can cause problems.
> >
> > Doesn't the function's disable/unbind should call usb_ep_dequeue to make
> > sure the transfer has ended?
>
> USB function drivers like ECM or HID surely doesn't. It looks like
> there's assumption that all requests will be completed by UDC driver.
that's a bug on those drivers :-)
> Function ep_disable() should complete requests in hardware driver, but
> at least in DWC2 driver not all requests are completed at this stage
and that's a bug on dwc2 :-)
> (request which are in hardware FIFO are omitted to give them chance to
> be transferred). Those requests are forced to complete in udc_stop()
that's wrong, we're disabling the endpoint anyway. Either dwc2 needs to
wait_for_completion() or forcibly cancel the request. The bottom line is
that control should not exit ep_disable() until all requests have been
quiesced.
> function, and that's why it's needed to be called before unbind.
>
> >
> > .udc_stop may stop the controller, and .unbind may still visit hardware.
>
> Hmm, indeed it can be problem.
yes, it will be :-)
--
balbi
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-22 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-12 13:17 [PATCH] usb: gadget: udc-core: call udc_stop() before gadget unbind Robert Baldyga
2014-12-12 13:51 ` Krzysztof Opasiak
2014-12-15 5:13 ` Peter Chen
2014-12-15 10:05 ` Robert Baldyga
2014-12-22 16:34 ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2014-12-23 6:34 ` Robert Baldyga
2014-12-23 18:31 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-12-29 7:30 ` Robert Baldyga
2014-12-29 16:39 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-12-15 16:14 ` Alan Stern
2014-12-22 16:32 ` Felipe Balbi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141222163430.GH12815@saruman \
--to=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=k.opasiak@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=peter.chen@freescale.com \
--cc=r.baldyga@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox