public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
To: Robert Baldyga <r.baldyga@samsung.com>
Cc: <balbi@ti.com>, Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>,
	<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	<k.opasiak@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: udc-core: call udc_stop() before gadget unbind
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 12:31:20 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141223183120.GG9147@saruman> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54990CE7.1030008@samsung.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2221 bytes --]

On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 07:34:15AM +0100, Robert Baldyga wrote:
> Hi Felipe,
> 
> On 12/22/2014 05:34 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:05:22AM +0100, Robert Baldyga wrote:
> >> On 12/15/2014 06:13 AM, Peter Chen wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 02:17:28PM +0100, Robert Baldyga wrote:
> >>>> As usb function drivers assumes that all usb request will be completed
> >>>> before function unbind call, we should supply such behavior. In some
> >>>> cases ep_disable() won't kill all request effectively, because some
> >>>> IN requests can be in running state. In such situation it's possible
> >>>> to have unbind function called before last request completion, which
> >>>> can cause problems.
> >>>
> >>> Doesn't the function's disable/unbind should call usb_ep_dequeue to make
> >>> sure the transfer has ended?
> >>
> >> USB function drivers like ECM or HID surely doesn't. It looks like
> >> there's assumption that all requests will be completed by UDC driver.
> > 
> > that's a bug on those drivers :-)
> 
> So we can't make assumptions that requests will be completed in
> ep_disable()?

oh, no you can. I misread it.

> >> Function ep_disable() should complete requests in hardware driver, but
> >> at least in DWC2 driver not all requests are completed at this stage
> > 
> > and that's a bug on dwc2 :-)
> 
> I have already found that out. Another UDC drivers simply kill all
> request without waiting for currently running, so I did the same in
> DWC2. Here is my patch:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg118698.html

should be in my pull request already.

> >> (request which are in hardware FIFO are omitted to give them chance to
> >> be transferred). Those requests are forced to complete in udc_stop()
> > 
> > that's wrong, we're disabling the endpoint anyway. Either dwc2 needs to
> > wait_for_completion() or forcibly cancel the request. The bottom line is
> > that control should not exit ep_disable() until all requests have been
> > quiesced.
> 
> So that's not bug in function drivers. They make correct assumption,
> because they expect that requests will be completed in ep_disable().

right :-)

-- 
balbi

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-23 18:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-12 13:17 [PATCH] usb: gadget: udc-core: call udc_stop() before gadget unbind Robert Baldyga
2014-12-12 13:51 ` Krzysztof Opasiak
2014-12-15  5:13 ` Peter Chen
2014-12-15 10:05   ` Robert Baldyga
2014-12-22 16:34     ` Felipe Balbi
2014-12-23  6:34       ` Robert Baldyga
2014-12-23 18:31         ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2014-12-29  7:30           ` Robert Baldyga
2014-12-29 16:39             ` Felipe Balbi
2014-12-15 16:14 ` Alan Stern
2014-12-22 16:32 ` Felipe Balbi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141223183120.GG9147@saruman \
    --to=balbi@ti.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=k.opasiak@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=peter.chen@freescale.com \
    --cc=r.baldyga@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox