From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Chris Zhong <zyw@rock-chips.com>
Cc: heiko@sntech.de, dianders@chromium.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] regulator: rk808: add dvs support
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 17:04:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141230170445.GP17800@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54A216E2.4090504@rock-chips.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1107 bytes --]
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 11:07:14AM +0800, Chris Zhong wrote:
> On 12/30/2014 01:25 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >So, this seems a bit odd. What we appear to be doing here is
> >alternating between the two different voltage setting registers which is
> >all well and good but makes me wonder why we're bothering - it's a bit
> >more work than just sticking with one. We do get...
> you mean check the old_selector and selector? I think
> _regulator_do_set_voltage have done it.
No, I mean that we may as well just always write to the same register
and save a bunch of code.
> >...this but unless the voltage typically ramps much faster than spec
> >it's never clear to me that we're actually winning by polling the pin
> >instead of just dead reckoning the time, it's more work for the CPU to
> >poll the GPIO than to sleep after all.
> Actually, it's slower than spec, so I think getting this dvsok pin state
> is safer than delay.
Well, that suggests that the spec is wrong which ought to be fixed
anyway oughtn't it? Or are you saying that the delay is inconsistent as
well as slower than advertised?
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-30 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-15 3:07 [PATCH v3 0/2] add the dvs support for rk808 Chris Zhong
2014-12-15 3:07 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] mfd: dt-bindings: add the description about dvs gpio " Chris Zhong
2014-12-15 3:07 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] regulator: rk808: add dvs support Chris Zhong
2014-12-29 17:25 ` Mark Brown
2014-12-30 3:07 ` Chris Zhong
2014-12-30 17:04 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2014-12-31 2:21 ` Chris Zhong
2015-01-02 18:41 ` Doug Anderson
2015-01-06 12:12 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141230170445.GP17800@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=zyw@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox