From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752171AbbABRgT (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jan 2015 12:36:19 -0500 Received: from mail-wg0-f46.google.com ([74.125.82.46]:41684 "EHLO mail-wg0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750777AbbABRgS (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jan 2015 12:36:18 -0500 Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 18:36:12 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Jiri Olsa Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Adrian Hunter , Alexis Berlemont , Andi Kleen , Anton Blanchard , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Borislav Petkov , Borislav Petkov , Cody P Schafer , Corey Ashford , David Ahern , Florian Fainelli , Frederic Weisbecker , Jean Pihet , Mark Salter , Namhyung Kim , Paul Mackerras , Peter Zijlstra , Sam Ravnborg , Stephane Eranian , Sukadev Bhattiprolu , Will Deacon Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCHSET 00/30] perf tools: New build framework Message-ID: <20150102173612.GA5941@gmail.com> References: <1420212972-21595-1-git-send-email-jolsa@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1420212972-21595-1-git-send-email-jolsa@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Jiri Olsa wrote: > [...] The basic idea is the same as in kbuild system, with some > minor changes to allow for multiple binaries build definitions. > tools/perf/Build | 48 ++ > tools/perf/Build.include | 75 ++++ > tools/perf/Documentation/Build | 123 +++++ > tools/perf/Makefile.build | 122 +++++ > tools/perf/Makefile.perf | 566 +++--------------------- > 47 files changed, 827 insertions(+), 541 deletions(-) Even the diffstat looks pretty good: only a modest line count increase. It would be useful to put this (and other build features - such as features/parallelisation support) into tools/kbuild/ though, so that other tooling can make easy use of it as well. For example tools/kvm/ (an external project) started off with an earlier version of the perf build system. Sharing that would make quite a bit of sense, as tooling (and most user-space project) build systems are usually have pretty poor quality. Thanks, Ingo