linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
	tixy@linaro.org, ananth@in.ibm.com, sandeepa.prabhu@linaro.org,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com,
	masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com, wcohen@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 6/8] ARM64: Handle TRAP_HWBRKPT for user mode as well
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 19:05:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150102180523.GC6761@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1e0a9e778669bb2a2e40bf101eff8ae85110ce54.1420038188.git.panand@redhat.com>

Let me repeat once again that I know absolutely nothing about arm* ;)

On 12/31, Pratyush Anand wrote:
>
> uprobe registers a handler at step_hook. So, single_step_handler now
> checks for user mode as well if there is a valid hook.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
> index b056369fd47d..2676b8655241 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
> @@ -236,6 +236,9 @@ static int single_step_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr,
>  	if (!reinstall_suspended_bps(regs))
>  		return 0;
>
> +	if (call_step_hook(regs, esr) == DBG_HOOK_HANDLED)
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	if (user_mode(regs)) {
>  		info.si_signo = SIGTRAP;
>  		info.si_errno = 0;
> @@ -251,9 +254,6 @@ static int single_step_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr,
>  		 */
>  		user_rewind_single_step(current);
>  	} else {
> -		if (call_step_hook(regs, esr) == DBG_HOOK_HANDLED)
> -			return 0;
> -

Agreed, we need something like this change...

But did you verify that it can't break other users of register_step_hook() ?
The current handlers do not check user_mode() == F, they assume that they
can't be called otherwise.

If this all is correct, please explain why in the changelog.

The same for the next patch.

Oleg.


  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-02 18:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-31 15:21 [RFC 0/8] ARM64: Uprobe support added Pratyush Anand
2014-12-31 15:21 ` [RFC 1/8] ARM64: Move BRK opcodes defines from kprobes.h to insn.h Pratyush Anand
2015-01-08 16:55   ` Will Deacon
2015-01-08 17:31     ` Pratyush Anand
2014-12-31 15:21 ` [RFC 2/8] ARM64: Refactor kprobes-arm64 Pratyush Anand
2015-01-08 16:55   ` Will Deacon
2015-01-08 17:33     ` Pratyush Anand
2015-01-08 17:36       ` Will Deacon
2015-01-08 17:39         ` Pratyush Anand
2014-12-31 15:21 ` [RFC 3/8] Kernel/uprobe: Define arch_uprobe_exception_notify as __weak Pratyush Anand
2015-01-02 17:43   ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-04 13:50     ` Pratyush Anand
2014-12-31 15:21 ` [RFC 4/8] ARM64: Add instruction_pointer_set function Pratyush Anand
2015-01-08 16:59   ` Will Deacon
2015-01-09  5:18     ` Pratyush Anand
2014-12-31 15:21 ` [RFC 5/8] ARM64: Re-factor flush_ptrace_access Pratyush Anand
2015-01-02 17:51   ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-02 18:19     ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-04 13:50       ` Pratyush Anand
2014-12-31 15:21 ` [RFC 6/8] ARM64: Handle TRAP_HWBRKPT for user mode as well Pratyush Anand
2015-01-02 18:05   ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2015-01-08 17:01     ` Will Deacon
2015-01-08 17:51       ` Pratyush Anand
2014-12-31 15:21 ` [RFC 7/8] ARM64: Handle TRAP_BRKPT " Pratyush Anand
2014-12-31 15:21 ` [RFC 8/8] ARM64: Add uprobe support Pratyush Anand
2015-01-02 17:23   ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-04 13:49     ` Pratyush Anand
2015-01-04 18:40       ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-05  4:17         ` Pratyush Anand
2015-01-08 17:03   ` Will Deacon
2015-01-08 17:54     ` Pratyush Anand
2015-01-09 17:45       ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-12  4:50         ` Pratyush Anand
2015-01-09 17:59   ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-12  5:04     ` Pratyush Anand
2015-01-12  6:45       ` Pratyush Anand
2015-01-12 14:38         ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-12 14:28       ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-01  1:59 ` [RFC 0/8] ARM64: Uprobe support added Pratyush Anand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150102180523.GC6761@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=panand@redhat.com \
    --cc=sandeepa.prabhu@linaro.org \
    --cc=tixy@linaro.org \
    --cc=wcohen@redhat.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).