From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
tixy@linaro.org, ananth@in.ibm.com, sandeepa.prabhu@linaro.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com,
masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com, wcohen@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 6/8] ARM64: Handle TRAP_HWBRKPT for user mode as well
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 19:05:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150102180523.GC6761@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1e0a9e778669bb2a2e40bf101eff8ae85110ce54.1420038188.git.panand@redhat.com>
Let me repeat once again that I know absolutely nothing about arm* ;)
On 12/31, Pratyush Anand wrote:
>
> uprobe registers a handler at step_hook. So, single_step_handler now
> checks for user mode as well if there is a valid hook.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
> index b056369fd47d..2676b8655241 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
> @@ -236,6 +236,9 @@ static int single_step_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr,
> if (!reinstall_suspended_bps(regs))
> return 0;
>
> + if (call_step_hook(regs, esr) == DBG_HOOK_HANDLED)
> + return 0;
> +
> if (user_mode(regs)) {
> info.si_signo = SIGTRAP;
> info.si_errno = 0;
> @@ -251,9 +254,6 @@ static int single_step_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr,
> */
> user_rewind_single_step(current);
> } else {
> - if (call_step_hook(regs, esr) == DBG_HOOK_HANDLED)
> - return 0;
> -
Agreed, we need something like this change...
But did you verify that it can't break other users of register_step_hook() ?
The current handlers do not check user_mode() == F, they assume that they
can't be called otherwise.
If this all is correct, please explain why in the changelog.
The same for the next patch.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-02 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-31 15:21 [RFC 0/8] ARM64: Uprobe support added Pratyush Anand
2014-12-31 15:21 ` [RFC 1/8] ARM64: Move BRK opcodes defines from kprobes.h to insn.h Pratyush Anand
2015-01-08 16:55 ` Will Deacon
2015-01-08 17:31 ` Pratyush Anand
2014-12-31 15:21 ` [RFC 2/8] ARM64: Refactor kprobes-arm64 Pratyush Anand
2015-01-08 16:55 ` Will Deacon
2015-01-08 17:33 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-01-08 17:36 ` Will Deacon
2015-01-08 17:39 ` Pratyush Anand
2014-12-31 15:21 ` [RFC 3/8] Kernel/uprobe: Define arch_uprobe_exception_notify as __weak Pratyush Anand
2015-01-02 17:43 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-04 13:50 ` Pratyush Anand
2014-12-31 15:21 ` [RFC 4/8] ARM64: Add instruction_pointer_set function Pratyush Anand
2015-01-08 16:59 ` Will Deacon
2015-01-09 5:18 ` Pratyush Anand
2014-12-31 15:21 ` [RFC 5/8] ARM64: Re-factor flush_ptrace_access Pratyush Anand
2015-01-02 17:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-02 18:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-04 13:50 ` Pratyush Anand
2014-12-31 15:21 ` [RFC 6/8] ARM64: Handle TRAP_HWBRKPT for user mode as well Pratyush Anand
2015-01-02 18:05 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2015-01-08 17:01 ` Will Deacon
2015-01-08 17:51 ` Pratyush Anand
2014-12-31 15:21 ` [RFC 7/8] ARM64: Handle TRAP_BRKPT " Pratyush Anand
2014-12-31 15:21 ` [RFC 8/8] ARM64: Add uprobe support Pratyush Anand
2015-01-02 17:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-04 13:49 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-01-04 18:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-05 4:17 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-01-08 17:03 ` Will Deacon
2015-01-08 17:54 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-01-09 17:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-12 4:50 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-01-09 17:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-12 5:04 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-01-12 6:45 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-01-12 14:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-12 14:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-01 1:59 ` [RFC 0/8] ARM64: Uprobe support added Pratyush Anand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150102180523.GC6761@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=panand@redhat.com \
--cc=sandeepa.prabhu@linaro.org \
--cc=tixy@linaro.org \
--cc=wcohen@redhat.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).