From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752941AbbADVkw (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2015 16:40:52 -0500 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:37431 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752788AbbADVkv (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2015 16:40:51 -0500 Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 22:40:49 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Nicolas Pitre , Linus Torvalds , Marc Zyngier , kernel list Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert 9fc2105aeaaf56b0cf75296a84702d0f9e64437b to fix pyaudio (and probably more) Message-ID: <20150104214049.GA4985@amd> References: <20150104190123.GA20153@amd> <20150104201026.GA23427@amd> <20150104203724.GA16372@amd> <20150104212659.GC12302@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150104212659.GC12302@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun 2015-01-04 21:26:59, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 04:20:57PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > On Sun, 4 Jan 2015, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > > > > > > It wasted a lot of people's time before by simply being there and wrong > > > > before it was removed. It's only a matter of whose time you want to > > > > waste. Really. > > > > > > Really. Shut up. > > > > > > The whole "no regressions" thing is very much about the fact that we > > > don't waste users time. > > > > I was talking about users time all along. > > > > Never mind. I'm sorry for the NAK and sorry for attempting to start a > > discussion to find a better replacement. > > Nico, > > I encourage you *not* to back down like this. Linus is right in so far > as the regressions issue, but he is *totally* wrong to do the revert, > which IMHO has been done out of nothing more than spite. > > Either *with or without* the revert, the issue still remains, and needs > to be addressed properly. > > With the revert in place, we now have insanely small bogomips values > reported via /proc/cpuinfo when hardware timers are used. That needs > fixing. Too bad 9fc2105aeaaf56b0cf75296a84702d0f9e64437b's changelog did not mention that :-(. I see reasonable values on Nokia N900. Do I need to change my config to see the problem, or should I try reproducing on socfpga board? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html