From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756777AbbAFVVF (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2015 16:21:05 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:42704 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753447AbbAFVVD (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2015 16:21:03 -0500 Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 13:21:02 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Joe Perches Cc: Daniel Thompson , Jason Wessel , lkml , "kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net" , Ingo Molnar , John Stultz , Sumit Semwal , Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: kgdb-next not pushed to Linus for 3.19 Message-Id: <20150106132102.65ad5988fc566357450e3d65@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1420570662.2652.36.camel@perches.com> References: <54AC2F5D.9050405@linaro.org> <1420570662.2652.36.camel@perches.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.0beta7 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 06 Jan 2015 10:57:42 -0800 Joe Perches wrote: > On Tue, 2015-01-06 at 18:54 +0000, Daniel Thompson wrote: > > Hi Jason > > > > I'm trying to figure out what to do with my long-outstanding kgdb/kdb > > patches in preparation for the 3.20 merge window. > > > > As of now I have five pending patch sets some of which are well over six > > months old (and none have nay outstanding review comments). > > > > When I raised this with you a couple of months ago, two of the patch > > sets did land in your kgdb-next tree. However nothing seems to have > > happened since then and I couldn't find any messages from you during the > > 3.19 merge window. > > > > I'm afraid I don't know what else I need to do to progress things. > > > > I do plan to do routine rebasing and resending of my patchsets but, > > based on the past experience, that seems unlikely to be enough to get > > the code delivered in 3.20. > > > > Do you think I would be better sending these patches via someone else? > > In any case, advice would be very welcome. > > Andrew? > > I think Daniel's kgdb patches are bug fixes. > > Can you please pick them up? yup. Merging patches which are already in -next is a bit of a pain, but I'll cope. Daniel, can you please resend everything in a nice clean coherent stream?