From: Calvin Owens <calvinowens@fb.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@fb.com>,
<calvinowens@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] ksoftirqd: Enable IRQs and call cond_resched() before poking RCU
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 17:49:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150107014906.GA27996@mail.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1420594659-16996-1-git-send-email-calvinowens@fb.com>
While debugging an issue with excessive softirq usage, I encountered the
following note in commit 3e339b5dae24a706 ("softirq: Use hotplug thread
infrastructure"):
[ paulmck: Call rcu_note_context_switch() with interrupts enabled. ]
...but despite this note, the patch still calls RCU with IRQs disabled.
This seemingly innocuous change caused a significant regression in softirq
CPU usage on the sending side of a large TCP transfer (~1 GB/s): when
introducing 0.01% packet loss, the softirq usage would jump to around 25%,
spiking as high as 50%. Before the change, the usage would never exceed 5%.
Moving the call to rcu_note_context_switch() after the cond_sched() call,
as it was originally before the hotplug patch, completely eliminated this
problem.
Signed-off-by: Calvin Owens <calvinowens@fb.com>
---
Changes since v1:
I mixed up the kernel versions I was patching against, sorry!
kernel/softirq.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index 501baa9..9e787d8 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -656,9 +656,13 @@ static void run_ksoftirqd(unsigned int cpu)
* in the task stack here.
*/
__do_softirq();
- rcu_note_context_switch();
local_irq_enable();
cond_resched();
+
+ preempt_disable();
+ rcu_note_context_switch();
+ preempt_enable();
+
return;
}
local_irq_enable();
--
2.1.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-07 1:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-07 1:37 [PATCH] ksoftirqd: Enable IRQs and call cond_resched() before poking RCU Calvin Owens
2015-01-07 1:49 ` Calvin Owens [this message]
2015-01-07 2:19 ` [PATCH v2] " Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-07 16:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-08 4:33 ` Calvin Owens
2015-01-08 4:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-08 21:46 ` Calvin Owens
2015-01-13 11:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-01-13 18:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-13 21:16 ` [PATCH] " Calvin Owens
2015-01-14 22:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-20 13:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-01-20 20:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-21 3:40 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-01-21 5:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-21 6:29 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-01-21 9:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-01-21 10:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-22 10:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150107014906.GA27996@mail.thefacebook.com \
--to=calvinowens@fb.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).