From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751717AbbAMJ5m (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jan 2015 04:57:42 -0500 Received: from sauhun.de ([89.238.76.85]:34834 "EHLO pokefinder.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750921AbbAMJ5j (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jan 2015 04:57:39 -0500 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:57:26 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: Yingjoe Chen Cc: Liguo Zhang , Xudong Chen , Mark Rutland , Russell King , Pawel Moll , srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, Ian Campbell , Linus Walleij , YH Chen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Grant Likely , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Sascha Hauer , Kumar Gala , Matthias Brugger , Nathan Chung , Eddie Huang , Jean Delvare , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] ARM: mediatek: Add driver for Mediatek I2C controller Message-ID: <20150113095725.GC1059@katana> References: <1416821928-11453-1-git-send-email-xudong.chen@mediatek.com> <20141124121555.GG3733@katana> <1417096856.12707.59.camel@mtksdaap41> <20141127164536.GC5667@katana> <1418352022.4994.44.camel@mtksdaap41> <20150106133753.GA3754@katana> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cHMo6Wbp1wrKhbfi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150106133753.GA3754@katana> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --cHMo6Wbp1wrKhbfi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 02:37:53PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: >=20 > > We've started upstream work for MT8173[1]. > >=20 > > We've fixed these issues for new SoC, and we believe it is fully I2C > > compatible now. We'll add mt8173 support to this driver, so this driver > > will support both fully I2C compatible SoC and the current one. >=20 > From what you tell, I'd rather add the MT8173 support incrementally. > Let's get first the limited support properly implemented, then add > another controller. >=20 > I'll send out my draft for describing the quirks later today. What do you think about my two proposals? --cHMo6Wbp1wrKhbfi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUtOwFAAoJEBQN5MwUoCm2EccP/RS4dHJuEzMWgB63gBreS80V YO0Xtq1BxM4Q7yDuHnzKVHF4K8rCPbxRZNgpx/xQBOyynE0ZpM/rqnNShRhMty4H Pl+pr0aG5++hw5zOP32yoaEJtJkzP9US+FZxKphnMPO3+vpqSZvcXQNi/HVcG05c 6WepQcC9YM/bRcQKY79tHvyH4E1qvs0MaX0GYESC9Vw07KQa9tlg38LLkqvidTC7 BYjjrVuim98t8O4BtxN4O8tPY6ASCK5WA2h/IpKQOyWKWQQXI4R/ZqELLF2y6WtR vPkD4tgQVwmPe67K5rTmNzEv5EgI0GFb8yXXK7BZVdioh4+5db2oFWKYAEE0Xdsj KLMYgwgvM9HFG63vffqSpXvJXybNwJgTYRTcU/sEtBGHvC5VZUxsEyi2WCRlsEoJ ULbGZtHRJ4SwBE0nkpKLJCBYO/KnxRcNBFG/vKfnR1fh9UN1pQeLzZlTunrcO7wY GxclcKMU42mn1y8iGTT+fBB24xc+oxnclqXw75/8BzK4UTskshVbgXRql4WdPRrG PoFh8OaMcKQmO9QCDqWm9yWbwdScVdcU+S9qK/KhLKUCS6LFMy6pKML+X1+w56iN M51V91A/6lhBqSDx1pZkm0HpwHJJEyqNTCpvMAf68z6ZHvAswolSl4O2Cu5KgKvZ pmYlTBo7NbEbt9CmIROC =IYs2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cHMo6Wbp1wrKhbfi--