public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Ian Kent <ikent@redhat.com>
Cc: Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <onestero@redhat.com>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>,
	Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
	Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Second attempt at contained helper execution
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 17:10:11 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150114221011.GC7071@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150114215525.GB7071@fieldses.org>

> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 05:32:22PM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> > There are other difficulties to tackle as well, such as how to decide
> > if contained helper execution is needed. For example, if a mount has
> > been propagated to a container or bound into the container tree (such
> > as with the --volume option of "docker run") the root init namespace
> > may need to be used and not the container namespace.

I think you have to go through each of the existing upcall examples and
decide what's needed for each.

At least for the nfsv4 idmapper I would've thought the namespace the
mount was done in would be the right choice, hence my previous question.

--b.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-14 22:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-14  9:32 [RFC PATCH 0/5] Second attempt at contained helper execution Ian Kent
2015-01-14  9:32 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] nsproxy - refactor setns() Ian Kent
2015-01-14  9:32 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] kmod - rename call_usermodehelper() flags parameter Ian Kent
2015-01-14  9:32 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] kmod - teach call_usermodehelper() to use a namespace Ian Kent
2015-01-15 16:45   ` Jeff Layton
2015-01-16  1:18     ` Ian Kent
2015-01-14  9:32 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] KEYS - rename call_usermodehelper_keys() flags parameter Ian Kent
2015-01-14  9:32 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] KEYS: exec request-key within the requesting task's init namespace Ian Kent
2015-01-14 21:55 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] Second attempt at contained helper execution J. Bruce Fields
2015-01-14 22:10   ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2015-01-15  0:26     ` Ian Kent
2015-01-15 16:27       ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-01-16  1:01         ` Ian Kent
2015-01-16 15:25           ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-01-21  7:05             ` Ian Kent
2015-01-21 14:38               ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-01-22  1:28                 ` Ian Kent
2015-02-18 20:44                   ` J. Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150114221011.GC7071@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=bcodding@redhat.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=ikent@redhat.com \
    --cc=jeff.layton@primarydata.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=onestero@redhat.com \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox