public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v3] Staging: vt6656: Checkpatch fix: else after break or return
@ 2015-01-13 17:12 Emrys Bayliss
  2015-01-17 22:49 ` Greg KH
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Emrys Bayliss @ 2015-01-13 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: forest, gregkh, tvboxspy, emrys; +Cc: devel, linux-kernel

This patch fixes the following checkpatch.pl error:
rxtx.c:558: WARNING: else is not generally useful after a break or return

Signed-off-by: Emrys Bayliss <emrys@paradise.net.nz>
---
The else statement was replaced with a block to avoid the following
compiler error:
"warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code"
due to this declaration:
struct vnt_cts *buf = &head->cts_g; (line 559)

Is there a better way such as using head (a union) directly instead?

The last patch I sent removed the return 0. Since this isn't related to
the error in the title I left it for a separate patch.

 drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c b/drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c
index ea5140a..831a051 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c
@@ -555,7 +555,9 @@ static u16 vnt_fill_cts_head(struct vnt_usb_send_context *tx_context,
 		memcpy(buf->data.ra, priv->current_net_addr, ETH_ALEN);
 
 		return vnt_rxtx_datahead_g_fb(tx_context, &buf->data_head);
-	} else {
+	}
+
+	{
 		struct vnt_cts *buf = &head->cts_g;
 		/* Get SignalField,ServiceField,Length */
 		vnt_get_phy_field(priv, cts_frame_len,
-- 
2.2.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3] Staging: vt6656: Checkpatch fix: else after break or return
  2015-01-13 17:12 [PATCH v3] Staging: vt6656: Checkpatch fix: else after break or return Emrys Bayliss
@ 2015-01-17 22:49 ` Greg KH
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2015-01-17 22:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Emrys Bayliss; +Cc: forest, tvboxspy, devel, linux-kernel

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 04:12:58AM +1100, Emrys Bayliss wrote:
> This patch fixes the following checkpatch.pl error:
> rxtx.c:558: WARNING: else is not generally useful after a break or return
> 
> Signed-off-by: Emrys Bayliss <emrys@paradise.net.nz>
> ---
> The else statement was replaced with a block to avoid the following
> compiler error:
> "warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code"
> due to this declaration:
> struct vnt_cts *buf = &head->cts_g; (line 559)
> 
> Is there a better way such as using head (a union) directly instead?
> 
> The last patch I sent removed the return 0. Since this isn't related to
> the error in the title I left it for a separate patch.
> 
>  drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c b/drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c
> index ea5140a..831a051 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c
> @@ -555,7 +555,9 @@ static u16 vnt_fill_cts_head(struct vnt_usb_send_context *tx_context,
>  		memcpy(buf->data.ra, priv->current_net_addr, ETH_ALEN);
>  
>  		return vnt_rxtx_datahead_g_fb(tx_context, &buf->data_head);
> -	} else {
> +	}
> +
> +	{
>  		struct vnt_cts *buf = &head->cts_g;
>  		/* Get SignalField,ServiceField,Length */
>  		vnt_get_phy_field(priv, cts_frame_len,

As I said before, this is not correct, please fix it up properly.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-01-17 23:32 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-01-13 17:12 [PATCH v3] Staging: vt6656: Checkpatch fix: else after break or return Emrys Bayliss
2015-01-17 22:49 ` Greg KH

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox