From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
To: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/4] x86, entry: some cleanup and simplification...
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 13:05:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150118120503.GA3424@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1421581520-2816-1-git-send-email-heukelum@fastmail.fm>
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 12:45:16PM +0100, Alexander van Heukelum wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> The last patchset did not compile on i386. Please ignore it. This one
> should be better. Instead of removing KERNEL_STACK_OFFSET, it is now
> used consistently on both i386 and x86_64.
>
> Boot tested using qemu (using klibc for userspace)
> - x86_64, 32-bit userspace, core2duo (sysenter32)
> - x86_64, 32-bit userspace, phenom (syscall32)
> - x86_64, 32-bit userspace, vdso=0 (int 0x80)
> - x86_64, 64-bit userspace
> - i386, pentium3 (sysenter)
> - i386, athlon (syscall)
> - i386, vdso=0 (int 0x80)
>
> They were tested on top of 22f2aa4a0361707a5cfb1de9d45260b39965dead
> (x86/entry-devel in your tree) and this kernel is now running on my
> laptop.
btw, you might wanna sync with Denys who's doing cleanups in that area too:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1421272101-16847-1-git-send-email-dvlasenk@redhat.com
and touching some of the stuff you're changing too.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-18 12:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-18 11:45 [PATCHv2 0/4] x86, entry: some cleanup and simplification Alexander van Heukelum
2015-01-18 11:45 ` [PATCHv2 1/4] x86_64: cleanup THREAD_INFO(reg,offset) macro Alexander van Heukelum
2015-01-21 13:40 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-01-21 16:20 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2015-01-21 18:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-01-21 18:48 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2015-01-18 11:45 ` [PATCHv2 2/4] x86_64: embrace KERNEL_STACK_OFFSET Alexander van Heukelum
2015-01-21 13:44 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-01-21 16:29 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2015-01-23 0:53 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-01-18 11:45 ` [PATCHv2 3/4] i386: clean up KERNEL_STACK_OFFSET Alexander van Heukelum
2015-01-18 11:45 ` [PATCHv2 4/4] x86_64, entry: Create IRET-compatible stack frame at syscall entry Alexander van Heukelum
2015-01-18 16:38 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-01-18 17:22 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2015-01-18 12:05 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2015-01-18 15:47 ` [PATCHv2 0/4] x86, entry: some cleanup and simplification Alexander van Heukelum
2015-01-21 13:26 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-01-21 15:51 ` Alexander van Heukelum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150118120503.GA3424@pd.tnic \
--to=bp@suse.de \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=heukelum@fastmail.fm \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox