From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753734AbbATQC7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jan 2015 11:02:59 -0500 Received: from mail-ig0-f177.google.com ([209.85.213.177]:34128 "EHLO mail-ig0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753631AbbATQC5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jan 2015 11:02:57 -0500 Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 16:02:48 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: Mark Brown Cc: Inha Song , robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org, sameo@linux.intel.com, ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v2 RESEND 2/2] mfd: arizona: Update DT binding to support OUTn_MONO init_data Message-ID: <20150120160248.GK13701@x1> References: <1420185829-24886-1-git-send-email-ideal.song@samsung.com> <1420185829-24886-3-git-send-email-ideal.song@samsung.com> <20150120122005.GA13701@x1> <20150120132001.GA21293@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20150120132001.GA21293@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 20 Jan 2015, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:20:05PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Fri, 02 Jan 2015, Inha Song wrote: > > > > This patch update DT binding to support OUTn_MONO init_data. Each > > > output signal can be configurated as a mono differential output. > > > The mono differential configuration is selected using the OUTn_MONO > > > registers. > > > This requires a DT Ack and an entry in the example. > > The DT maintainers have said they're OK with maintainers just merging > things if they're comfortable with it (see the bindings specific > submitting-patches.txt) and given their workload and general resulting > responsiveness it's going to make it difficult go get anything done. I only tend to poke the DT guys when I am unsure of something in the binding. In this case it was a doubt whether we should be encoding register values inside a property like this. I would also be happy to take it with your Ack if you're happy with it? -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog