From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752530AbbAVOyr (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:54:47 -0500 Received: from mail-ig0-f174.google.com ([209.85.213.174]:46190 "EHLO mail-ig0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752736AbbAVOyq (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:54:46 -0500 Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 14:54:40 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: Wolfram Sang Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@stlinux.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] i2c: i2c-st: Rename clock reference to something that exists Message-ID: <20150122145440.GD9129@x1> References: <1409234523-20240-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20150122121819.GC9129@x1> <20150122141427.GA3413@katana> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20150122141427.GA3413@katana> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:18:19PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > Wolfram, > > > > This patch has been on the list since forever. > > For reasons :) > > a) It was not CCed to the i2c list, so it doesn't show up in patchwork > which does the patch tracking for me. > > b) I was always under the impression that Maxime is going to take it? > He said so. > > > I have Acks from the driver author, so I'm going to take this through > > the MFD tree. If you perk up later and decide to take it though the > > I2C tree instead, let me know and I'll remove it from MFD. > > Well, I2C makes more sense than MFD, so I'll pick it up right now. > ST-tree would have also been fine. Works for me. Thanks dude. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog