public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>,
	Chegu Vinod <chegu_vinod@hp.com>,
	Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sched, timer: Use atomics for thread_group_cputimer stats
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 09:57:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150123085705.GG2896@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1421983913.4432.22.camel@j-VirtualBox>

On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 07:31:53PM -0800, Jason Low wrote:
> When running a database workload, we found a scalability issue
> with itimers.
> 
> Much of the problem was caused by the thread_group_cputimer spinlock.
> Each time we account for group system/user time, we need to obtain a
> thread_group_cputimer's spinlock to update the timers. On larger
> systems (such as a 16 socket machine), this caused more than 30% of
> total time spent trying to obtain the kernel lock to update these
> group timer stats.
> 
> This patch converts the timers to 64 bit atomic variables and use
> atomic add to update them without a lock. With this patch, the percent
> of total time spent updating thread group cputimer timers was reduced
> from 30% down to less than 1%.

I'll have to look; I worry about consistency between the values. But why
would any self respecting piece of software use this crap stuff? Its a
guaranteed scalability fail.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-23  8:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-23  3:31 [RFC PATCH] sched, timer: Use atomics for thread_group_cputimer stats Jason Low
2015-01-23  8:57 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2015-01-23  9:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-23 19:23   ` Jason Low
2015-01-23 20:08     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-23 23:39       ` Jason Low
2015-01-23 23:45       ` Jason Low
2015-01-26 17:12         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-23  9:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-23 18:07   ` Jason Low
2015-01-23 20:11     ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150123085705.GG2896@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=aswin@hp.com \
    --cc=chegu_vinod@hp.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jason.low2@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
    --cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox