From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
To: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
linux390@de.ibm.com, Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Resend Patch v4 14/16] smp, s390: Kill SMP single function call interrupt
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 10:32:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150123093200.GB5101@osiris> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54C212A6.5030702@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 05:21:42PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> On 2015/1/23 14:54, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 01:36:53PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> >> Commit 9a46ad6d6df3b54 "smp: make smp_call_function_many() use logic
> >> similar to smp_call_function_single()" has unified the way to handle
> >> single and multiple cross-CPU function calls. Now only one interrupt
> >> is needed for architecture specific code to support generic SMP function
> >> call interfaces, so kill the redundant single function call interrupt.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
> >> Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com>
> >
> > Is this really the patch I acked, whenever that was? Because the patch
> > description doesn't match what your patch does.
> > All it does is renaming ec_call_function_single to ec_call_function,
> > nothing else.
> >
> > Could you please resend with a proper patch description?
> > Thanks!
> >
> >> ---
> >> arch/s390/kernel/smp.c | 10 +++++-----
> >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c b/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c
> >> index 0b499f5cbe19..5b89eabc3a01 100644
> >> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c
> >> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c
> >> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
> >>
> >> enum {
> >> ec_schedule = 0,
> >> - ec_call_function_single,
> >> + ec_call_function,
> >> ec_stop_cpu,
> >> };
> >>
> >> @@ -416,8 +416,8 @@ static void smp_handle_ext_call(void)
> >> smp_stop_cpu();
> >> if (test_bit(ec_schedule, &bits))
> >> scheduler_ipi();
> >> - if (test_bit(ec_call_function_single, &bits))
> >> - generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt();
> HI Heiko,
> The background is that the generic smp_call_xxx() interfaces
> only use on interrupt now, previously it used two (FUNC_CALL and
> FUNC_CALL_SINGLE). So the whole patch set is to kill
> FUNC_CALL_SINGLE from all architectures.
> Above code kills generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt().
> We also replaces ec_call_function_single with ec_call_function so
> only one interrupt will be used to support smp_call_xxx().
Ah right, I missed that while looking at your patch. Apologies!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-23 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-23 5:36 [Resend Patch v4 00/16] Kill SMP single function call interrupt Jiang Liu
2015-01-23 5:36 ` [Resend Patch v4 01/16] smp, alpha: " Jiang Liu
2015-01-23 5:36 ` [Resend Patch v4 02/16] smp, ARM: " Jiang Liu
2015-01-23 5:36 ` [Resend Patch v4 03/16] smp, ARM64: " Jiang Liu
2015-01-23 18:10 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-01-23 5:36 ` [Resend Patch v4 04/16] smp, IA64: " Jiang Liu
2015-01-23 5:36 ` [Resend Patch v4 05/16] smp, m32r: " Jiang Liu
2015-01-23 5:36 ` [Resend Patch v4 06/16] smp, mn10300: " Jiang Liu
2015-01-23 5:36 ` [Resend Patch v4 07/16] smp, mn10300: Enable arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask() Jiang Liu
2015-01-23 5:36 ` [Resend Patch v4 08/16] smp, sh: Kill SMP single function call interrupt Jiang Liu
2015-01-23 5:36 ` [Resend Patch v4 09/16] smp, sparc64: " Jiang Liu
2015-01-23 5:36 ` [Resend Patch v4 10/16] smp, sparc: " Jiang Liu
2015-01-23 5:36 ` [Resend Patch v4 11/16] smp, x86, xen: " Jiang Liu
2015-01-23 5:36 ` [Resend Patch v4 12/16] smp, x86: " Jiang Liu
2015-01-23 8:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-23 11:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-01-23 5:36 ` [Resend Patch v4 13/16] smp, tile: " Jiang Liu
2015-01-23 5:36 ` [Resend Patch v4 14/16] smp, s390: " Jiang Liu
2015-01-23 6:54 ` Heiko Carstens
2015-01-23 9:21 ` Jiang Liu
2015-01-23 9:32 ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2015-01-23 5:36 ` [Resend Patch v4 15/16] smp: Cleanup unsued generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt() Jiang Liu
2015-01-23 5:36 ` [Resend Patch v4 16/16] smp, trivial: Remove unused function prototype from smp_boot.h Jiang Liu
2015-01-24 19:28 ` [Resend Patch v4 00/16] Kill SMP single function call interrupt Thomas Gleixner
2015-01-26 2:13 ` Jiang Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150123093200.GB5101@osiris \
--to=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux390@de.ibm.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).