From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755529AbbAWO1K (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jan 2015 09:27:10 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:47232 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750827AbbAWO1G (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jan 2015 09:27:06 -0500 Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 15:27:02 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: John Stultz Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Dave Jones , Linus Torvalds , Thomas Gleixner , Richard Cochran , Prarit Bhargava , Stephen Boyd , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/12] time: Add debugging checks to warn if we see delays Message-ID: <20150123142702.GA23123@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1421971767-17707-1-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org> <1421971767-17707-6-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1421971767-17707-6-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 04:09:20PM -0800, John Stultz wrote: > +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_TIMEKEEPING > +static void timekeeping_check_update(struct timekeeper *tk, cycle_t offset) > +{ > + > + cycle_t max_cycles = tk->tkr.clock->max_cycles; > + const char *name = tk->tkr.clock->name; > + > + if (offset > max_cycles) > + printk_deferred("ERROR: cycle offset (%lld) is larger then" > + " allowed %s max_cycles (%lld)\n", > + offset, name, max_cycles); > + else if (offset > (max_cycles >> 1)) > + printk_deferred("WARNING: cycle offset (%lld) is past" > + " the %s 50%% safety margin (%lld)\n", > + offset, name, max_cycles>>1); > +} > +#else > +#define timekeeping_check_update(x, y) static inline void timekeeping_check_update(struct timekeeper *tk, cycle_t offset) { } Would preserve argument type checks. The only argument for using a macro here would be to avoid evaluating the arguments, but that's not an issue in this case afaict. > +#endif