[PATCH char-misc] Drivers: hv: vmbus: hv_process_timer_expiration() can be static

[PATCH char-misc] Drivers: hv: vmbus: hv_process_timer_expiration() can be static

[kbuild test robot]

drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c:582:6: sparse: symbol 'hv_process_timer_expiration' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
 vmbus_drv.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c b/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c
index 7488111..35e3f42 100644
--- a/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c
@@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ static void vmbus_onmessage_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	kfree(ctx);
 }
 
-void hv_process_timer_expiration(struct hv_message *msg, int cpu)
+static void hv_process_timer_expiration(struct hv_message *msg, int cpu)
 {
 	struct clock_event_device *dev = hv_context.clk_evt[cpu];
 

[char-misc:char-misc-testing 54/73] drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c:582:6: sparse: symbol 'hv_process_timer_expiration' was not declared. Should it be static?

[kbuild test robot]

tree:   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/char-misc.git char-misc-testing
head:   930c796ad9a62bdc8384cbb71d5af332d9ec92f7
commit: 71123d54fb2346c7652d8d05dac2cee28cd69954 [54/73] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Implement a clockevent device
reproduce:
  # apt-get install sparse
  git checkout 71123d54fb2346c7652d8d05dac2cee28cd69954
  make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
  make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__


sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)

>> drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c:582:6: sparse: symbol 'hv_process_timer_expiration' was not declared. Should it be static?

Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
http://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/kbuild                 Intel Corporation