From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756442AbbA0CNr (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:13:47 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-f50.google.com ([209.85.220.50]:33151 "EHLO mail-pa0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750823AbbA0CNn (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:13:43 -0500 Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 18:13:44 -0800 From: Olof Johansson To: Nicolas Ferre Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Alexandre Belloni , ARM Maintainers , Boris BREZILLON , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: re-fromat AT91 part to match other entries Message-ID: <20150127021344.GA22154@quad.lixom.net> References: <20150112224203.GL22090@quad.lixom.net> <20150113230956.GA15087@quad.lixom.net> <20150113234759.GH3843@piout.net> <2263559.r5MiMeqJt6@wuerfel> <54C660FE.3000401@atmel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <54C660FE.3000401@atmel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 04:45:02PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > Le 14/01/2015 10:05, Arnd Bergmann a écrit : > > On Wednesday 14 January 2015 00:47:59 Alexandre Belloni wrote: > >> > >> On 13/01/2015 at 15:09:56 -0800, Olof Johansson wrote : > >>> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 03:43:00PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > >>>> The entries are separated as ARM V4/V5 and ARM V7 as some other per-SoC config > >>>> options may be removed in the near future. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre > >>>> --- > >>>> Hi Olof, > >>>> > >>>> This is an attempt to match other ARM SoC families format. > >>>> If you feel that the patch can be good, do not hesitate to take it yourself. I > >>>> don't plan to integrate it in any of my pull-request so it can appear quickly in > >>>> arm-soc and can be used by everyone. > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> If you see what Peter did, he split up the rules per-SoC based on how > >>> things were selectable in Kconfig. Since you seem to have the Kconfig > >>> entries already, how about doing the same? That way the same information > >>> w.r.t. SoC family that you have as comments isn't lost either. > >>> > >> > >> You didn't see the patch set yet because it depends on a lot of other > >> series still being discussed but after the switch to multiplatform, the > >> only config option left will be SOC_AT91RM9200, SOC_AT91SAM9 (both > >> under SOC_SAM_V4_V5) and SOC_SAMA5, under SOC_SAM_V7. > >> > >> That's our plan, unless you feel that we should keep one config option > >> per SoC. > > > > With the patches that I prepared last year, all of AT91SAM9 becomes > > one small file, so there really isn't any need to have separate Kconfig > > options. > > Hi Olof, > > After what noted Alexandre and Arnd, don't you think my initial attempt > was okay? Aka: ping ;-) Ah, yes. Applied now. -Olof