From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757603AbbA0J26 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2015 04:28:58 -0500 Received: from mx2.parallels.com ([199.115.105.18]:35252 "EHLO mx2.parallels.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757486AbbA0J24 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2015 04:28:56 -0500 Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 12:28:39 +0300 From: Vladimir Davydov To: Joonsoo Kim CC: Joonsoo Kim , Andrew Morton , Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg , David Rientjes , Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , "Linux Memory Management List" , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 3/3] slub: make dead caches discard free slabs immediately Message-ID: <20150127092838.GA5165@esperanza> References: <42d95683e3c7f4bb00be4d777e2b334e8981d552.1422275084.git.vdavydov@parallels.com> <20150127080009.GB11358@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE> <20150127082301.GD28978@esperanza> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 06:21:14PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > 2015-01-27 17:23 GMT+09:00 Vladimir Davydov : > > Hi Joonsoo, > > > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 05:00:09PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 03:55:29PM +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote: > >> > @@ -3381,6 +3390,15 @@ void __kmem_cache_shrink(struct kmem_cache *s) > >> > kmalloc(sizeof(struct list_head) * objects, GFP_KERNEL); > >> > unsigned long flags; > >> > > >> > + if (deactivate) { > >> > + /* > >> > + * Disable empty slabs caching. Used to avoid pinning offline > >> > + * memory cgroups by freeable kmem pages. > >> > + */ > >> > + s->cpu_partial = 0; > >> > + s->min_partial = 0; > >> > + } > >> > + > >> > >> Maybe, kick_all_cpus_sync() is needed here since object would > >> be freed asynchronously so they can't see this updated value. > > > > I thought flush_all() should do the trick, no? > > Unfortunately, it doesn't. > > flush_all() sends IPI to not all cpus. It only sends IPI to cpus where > some conditions > are met and freeing could occur on the other ones. Oh, true, missed that. Yeah, we should kick all cpus explicitly then. Will fix in the next iteration. Thanks for catching this! Thanks, Vladimir