From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Lunxue Dai <lunxue.dai@rock-chips.com>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@altera.com>,
"linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] watchdog: dw_wdt: pat the watchdog before enabling it
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 09:38:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150128093834.792fb55b@xhacker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1422397517-20426-1-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org>
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:25:16 -0800
Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> wrote:
> On some dw_wdt implementations the "top" register may be initted to 0
> at bootup. In such a case, each "pat" of the watchdog will reset the
> timer to 0xffff. That's pretty short.
>
> The input clock of the wdt can be any of a wide range of values. On
> an rk3288 system, I've seen the wdt clock be 24.75 MHz. That means
> each tick is ~40ns and we'll count to 0xffff in ~2.6ms.
>
> Because of the above two facts, it's a really good idea to pat the
> watchdog after initting the "top" register properly and before
> enabling the watchdog. If you don't then there's no way we'll get the
> next heartbeat in time.
>
> Jisheng Zhang fixed this problem on some dw_wdt versions by using the
> TOP_INIT feature. However, the dw_wdt on rk3288 doesn't have TOP_INIT
> so it's a good idea to also pat the watchdog manually.
>
> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - Better comments now that we know what's going on.
> - Don't typo dw_wdt as dw_mmc.
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Add comment about why TOP_INIT doesn't work on rk3288; move pat
> to right next to the attempt to use TOP_INIT.
>
> drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c
> index b34a2e4..3dde6de 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c
> @@ -96,6 +96,12 @@ static inline void dw_wdt_set_next_heartbeat(void)
> dw_wdt.next_heartbeat = jiffies + dw_wdt_get_top() * HZ;
> }
>
> +static void dw_wdt_keepalive(void)
> +{
> + writel(WDOG_COUNTER_RESTART_KICK_VALUE, dw_wdt.regs +
> + WDOG_COUNTER_RESTART_REG_OFFSET);
> +}
> +
> static int dw_wdt_set_top(unsigned top_s)
> {
> int i, top_val = DW_WDT_MAX_TOP;
> @@ -110,21 +116,27 @@ static int dw_wdt_set_top(unsigned top_s)
> break;
> }
>
> - /* Set the new value in the watchdog. */
> + /*
> + * Set the new value in the watchdog. Some versions of dw_wdt
> + * have have TOPINIT in the TIMEOUT_RANGE register (as per
> + * CP_WDT_DUAL_TOP in WDT_COMP_PARAMS_1). On those we
> + * effectively get a pat of the watchdog right here.
> + */
> writel(top_val | top_val << WDOG_TIMEOUT_RANGE_TOPINIT_SHIFT,
> dw_wdt.regs + WDOG_TIMEOUT_RANGE_REG_OFFSET);
>
> + /*
> + * Add an explicit pat to handle versions of the watchdog that
> + * don't have TOPINIT. This won't hurt on versions that have
> + * it.
> + */
> + dw_wdt_keepalive();
> +
> dw_wdt_set_next_heartbeat();
>
> return dw_wdt_top_in_seconds(top_val);
> }
>
> -static void dw_wdt_keepalive(void)
> -{
> - writel(WDOG_COUNTER_RESTART_KICK_VALUE, dw_wdt.regs +
> - WDOG_COUNTER_RESTART_REG_OFFSET);
> -}
> -
> static int dw_wdt_restart_handle(struct notifier_block *this,
> unsigned long mode, void *cmd)
> {
Looks good to me
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-28 1:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-27 22:25 [PATCH v3 1/2] watchdog: dw_wdt: pat the watchdog before enabling it Doug Anderson
2015-01-27 22:25 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] watchdog: dw_wdt: Try to get a 30 second watchdog by default Doug Anderson
2015-02-03 19:02 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2015-01-28 1:38 ` Jisheng Zhang [this message]
2015-01-28 18:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] watchdog: dw_wdt: pat the watchdog before enabling it Guenter Roeck
2015-02-03 19:01 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150128093834.792fb55b@xhacker \
--to=jszhang@marvell.com \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=dinguyen@altera.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lunxue.dai@rock-chips.com \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox